Sound Quality: Faceplate Aux In vs. Rear (RCA) Adapter vs. iPod-specific Adapter
Has anyone sampled different car audio set ups to gauge whether there's a difference in audio quality between inputting your ipod into a faceplate (JVC) mini-to-mini, into a RCA adapter cable out of the back of a unit (Alpine/Pioneer) or using an iPod specific adapter cable (that also recharges)? I used a Belkin Auto charger with line out & volume control which worked quite well with my cassette adapter & would use the line out from it with whatever new set up I chose (except the ipod specific one).
The JVC model w/ Aux In on faceplate seems like the easiest/cheapest option, however if using an RCA adapter cable out the back (i.e. on the Alpine or Pioneer) gives a better sound quality I'd go with that option. I'd prefer using the iPod to control the music, rather than a car stereo, but if there's a difference in sound quality, I would opt for the iPod specific adapter (using line out & recharging).
[940 byte] By [
chriswn] at [2007-11-10 14:37:39]

# 1 Re: Sound Quality: Faceplate Aux In vs. Rear (RCA) Adapter vs. iPod-specific Adapter
All of the methods you mentioned use a line input to the receiver. There shouldn't be a difference in sound quality between any of those. The only thing that would effect sound would be quality of the head unit, amplification, etc, not the input because it is essentially the same signal being brought into the receiver by different methods.
# 2 Re: Sound Quality: Faceplate Aux In vs. Rear (RCA) Adapter vs. iPod-specific Adapter
I can verify that they all sound the same. I had aux in (Pioneer) before I got my iPod adapter and there was NO noticable sound difference. (I was using the line out from an extra dock when I was using the aux in. You will notice a difference between the headphone jack and a true line in (like the iPod adapter).