More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
So here's the question:
How will this be bad for Democrats?
[457 byte] By [midwinter] at [2007-11-16 2:54:47] 
Those liberal bastards at the WSJ have run a hit piece on current World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/04/09/wolfowitz-responds-to-controversy-over-staffer/#comments) (previously known as the chief architect of the Iraq War). Wolfowitz is, apparently, paying his girlfriend $200K a year even after she left her position at the world bank.
So here's the question:
How will this be bad for Democrats?
«« Apple Insider makes top of Google News list for Leopard article
»» Hmmm... Never thought Id see THIS
»» Hmmm... Never thought Id see THIS
# 1 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Those liberal bastards at the WSJ have run a hit piece on current World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/04/09/wolfowitz-responds-to-controversy-over-staffer/#comments) (previously known as the chief architect of the Iraq War). Wolfowitz is, apparently, paying his girlfriend $200K a year even after she left her position at the world bank.So here's the question:
How will this be bad for Democrats?
It exposes their hypocrisy.
Remember how all the free love hippy liberals thought teh Clenis was such a stud for having sex with all those women? They totally cheered him on.
I believe the liberal Wall Street Journal ran many an editorial, generally along the lines of "make love, not eminently sensible measures to counter the growing Islamo-jihadi menace." Or words to that effect.
So now all the liberals are screaming about Wolfowitz, or they would be if they could be bothered, and it's all clearly payback for Iraq. If Hillary had been president of the World Bank you know as well as I do the defeatocrats would have claimed her lesbian love nests to be a great stride forward for "gay rights".
Meanwhile, people on the left have sex with strangers every day and it is met with silence. How very interesting.
Fucking liberals.
addabox at 2007-11-17 15:59:03 >
# 2 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
It exposes their hypocrisy.Remember how all the free love hippy liberals thought teh Clenis was such a stud for having sex with all those women? They totally cheered him on.
I believe the liberal Wall Street Journal ran many an editorial, generally along the lines of "make love, not eminently sensible measures to counter the growing Islamo-jihadi menace." Or words to that effect.
So now all the liberals are screaming about Wolfowitz, or they would be if they could be bothered, and it's all clearly payback for Iraq. If Hillary had been president of the World Bank you know as well as I do the defeatocrats would have claimed her lesbian love nests to be a great stride forward for "gay rights".
Meanwhile, people on the left have sex with strangers every day and it is met with silence. How very interesting.
Fucking liberals.
Or perhaps Wolfowitz is guilty as sin. How about that?
SDW2001 at 2007-11-17 16:00:03 >
# 3 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Or perhaps Wolfowitz is guilty as sin. How about that?Stop trying to change the subject.
addabox at 2007-11-17 16:01:02 >
# 4 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Or perhaps Wolfowitz is guilty as sin. How about that?An answer that is clearly the result of uncritically absorbing MSM bias. Guilty until proven innocent, huh? RUSH TO JUDGMENT, I SAY! RUSH TO JUDGMENT! We actually know remarkably little about this "scandal," and what we do know can be easily explained. Maybe her payment of $200K while no longer employed was simple oversight by a lower-level flunkie? What, precisely, does the blogger mean by "romantically" linked? Did he send her a Valentine's Day card?
Everyone just needs to calm down until all the facts are out.
midwinter at 2007-11-17 16:02:08 >
# 5 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
:lol:ShawnJ at 2007-11-17 16:03:07 >
# 6 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
While I know many disagree, I think thread naming at AI has become a genuine art form. :DFrank777 at 2007-11-17 16:04:07 >
# 7 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
(previously known as the chief architect of the Iraq War).Whoa. That went right by your incredulous distortion field didn't it?
How will this be bad for Democrats?
Who gives a fuck? How about humanity? I honestly wish you could accept the fact that this administration, no...this cabal of neocon fucktards (http://www.newamericancentury.org/) need to be rounded up, lined up against a wall and shot. For war crimes (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2396031.ece), treason (http://www.thechroniccurmudgeon.com/archives/2004/03/bushs_treason.htm) and a shitload (http://bushcrimes.net/) of other undeniably ruthless shit.
Liberal or not, this has been a serious downfall of U.S. government, it's World relations and human rights in anytime of American history. Face it...
You support scum.
@_@ Artman at 2007-11-17 16:05:10 >
# 8 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
It exposes their hypocrisy.Remember how all the free love hippy liberals thought teh Clenis was such a stud for having sex with all those women? They totally cheered him on.
I believe the liberal Wall Street Journal ran many an editorial, generally along the lines of "make love, not eminently sensible measures to counter the growing Islamo-jihadi menace." Or words to that effect.
So now all the liberals are screaming about Wolfowitz, or they would be if they could be bothered, and it's all clearly payback for Iraq. If Hillary had been president of the World Bank you know as well as I do the defeatocrats would have claimed her lesbian love nests to be a great stride forward for "gay rights".
Meanwhile, people on the left have sex with strangers every day and it is met with silence. How very interesting.
Fucking liberals.
Every day? :lol:
jimmac at 2007-11-17 16:06:14 >
# 9 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Meanwhile, people on the left have sex with strangers every day and it is met with silence. How very interesting.Fucking liberals.
You know what really chaps my hide? The newpaper doesn't have ANY problem whatsoever announcing who had SEX by telling me what babies were born and who the two sex-havers were (I'm surprised they don't tell us what position(s) they used) and yet NO ONE REPORTS HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE BORN AGAIN.
Fucking liberals, indeed.
midwinter at 2007-11-17 16:07:12 >
# 10 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Whoa. That went right by your incredulous distortion field didn't it?Who gives a fuck? How about humanity? I honestly wish you could accept the fact that this administration, no...this cabal of neocon fucktards (http://www.newamericancentury.org/) need to be rounded up, lined up against a wall and shot. For war crimes (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2396031.ece), treason (http://www.thechroniccurmudgeon.com/archives/2004/03/bushs_treason.htm) and a shitload (http://bushcrimes.net/) of other undeniably ruthless shit.
Liberal or not, this has been a serious downfall of U.S. government, it's World relations and human rights in anytime of American history. Face it...
You support scum.
*Whoosh!*
This post has to take the award for slowness on the uptake.
:p
ShawnJ at 2007-11-17 16:08:13 >
# 11 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
*Whoosh!*This post has to take the award for slowness on the uptake.
:p
I'm sick and tired of people rationalizing like alcoholics on this neocon debacle. Face the truth already...
@_@ Artman at 2007-11-17 16:09:12 >
# 12 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
midwinter was writing satirically...hardeeharhar at 2007-11-17 16:10:10 >
# 13 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
midwinter was writing satirically...http://www.eiaonline.com/uploaded_images/Emily_Litella-788000.jpg
Ooooh. Nevermind. :embarrass :lol: Sorry, midwinter.
But certain people who wish to attack this piece should read up on Wolfowitz as ambassador to Indonesia under Reagan (http://www.etan.org/et2005/march/27/29wolfwitz.htm).
Get back to us after that...
@_@ Artman at 2007-11-17 16:11:17 >
# 14 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
:lol:Laugh it up, Shawn.
SDW2001 at 2007-11-17 16:12:12 >
# 15 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Whoa. That went right by your incredulous distortion field didn't it?Who gives a fuck? How about humanity? I honestly wish you could accept the fact that this administration, no...this cabal of neocon fucktards (http://www.newamericancentury.org/) need to be rounded up, lined up against a wall and shot. For war crimes (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2396031.ece), treason (http://www.thechroniccurmudgeon.com/archives/2004/03/bushs_treason.htm) and a shitload (http://bushcrimes.net/) of other undeniably ruthless shit.
Liberal or not, this has been a serious downfall of U.S. government, it's World relations and human rights in anytime of American history. Face it...
You support scum.
You are an irrational hate monger.
SDW2001 at 2007-11-17 16:13:16 >
# 16 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
You are an irrational hate monger.You, sir, are a nappy headed 'ho.
midwinter at 2007-11-17 16:14:20 >
# 17 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
You, sir, are a nappy headed 'ho.That's it. I'm calling Jessie.
SDW2001 at 2007-11-17 16:15:17 >
# 18 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Don't do that, I love watching midwinter in his cowboy hat simulcast on MSNBC while also doing his radio show.Nick
trumptman at 2007-11-17 16:16:23 >
# 19 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
You are an irrational hate monger.http://blog.eponymous.org/pics/cash_finger.jpg
:smokey:
@_@ Artman at 2007-11-17 16:17:21 >
# 20 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
http://blog.eponymous.org/pics/cash_finger.jpg:smokey:
That's an odd-shaped penis you have.
SDW2001 at 2007-11-17 16:18:23 >
# 21 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Speaking of WSJ I came across this ( http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009948) today. It seems to clear Wolfowitz wrt his girl friend. I don't know if the WSJ's gets the motivation of those that whistleblew on this one right?mydo at 2007-11-17 16:19:18 >
# 22 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Speaking of WSJ I came across this (http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009948) today. It seems to clear Wolfowitz wrt his girl friend. I don't know if the WSJ's gets the motivation of those that whistleblew on this one right?Did I miss the part in that whatever it is (what the hell IS that piece, anyway? Editorial? Op-ed?) that explains whether she was paid her salary after she left the WB?
midwinter at 2007-11-17 16:20:28 >
# 23 Re: More Liberal Bias: WSJ Runs Hit Piece on Wolfowitz For Paying His GF $200K/year
Did I miss the part in that whatever it is (what the hell IS that piece, anyway? Editorial? Op-ed?) that explains whether she was paid her salary after she left the WB?It's an op-ed. Um no you don't read that anywhere in that piece. But at the very last it seems Wolfy was above the board from the start.
mydo at 2007-11-17 16:21:29 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]