Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

USA at the Olympics

I enjoy the olympics somewhat (IMO some "sports" are just really stupid, but others are really cool), But it seems at least for now that the United States (excluding swimming) is not doing to well. what do you guys think, i mean can't we field a better team?
[263 byte] By [xterra48] at [2007-11-15 19:00:48]
# 1 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by xterra48
I enjoy the olympics somewhat (IMO some "sports" are just really stupid, but others are really cool), But it seems at least for now that the United States (excluding swimming) is not doing to well. what do you guys think, i mean can't we field a better team?

no. americans have too big of egos and the gov't doesn't care
applenut at 2007-11-17 14:02:10 >
# 2 Re: USA at the Olympics
Well the USA Basketball team of hotshots and individual (NOT Team) "superstars" who get paid millions to play the game just got their asses handed to them by Puerto Rico by 19 points...good thing too...maybe this will teach these kids a little something.
filmmaker2002 at 2007-11-17 14:03:10 >
# 3 Re: USA at the Olympics
Nah, the olympics is just a place where the rest of the world can pretend that they are better than Americans at something, when really we don't care all that much about the games. We are there for marketing purposes, and not to win a damn thing. Sad really!

:devil: :\ ;)
ijerry at 2007-11-17 14:04:09 >
# 4 Re: USA at the Olympics
Here's a great article about the "Dream Team"...

Linky Linky ( http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/040804)
filmmaker2002 at 2007-11-17 14:05:14 >
# 5 Re: USA at the Olympics
As far as basketball is concerned, it would be very easy for america to dominate the thing entirely. But the team that was picked is a bunch of lazy streetballers plus Duncan and Iverson. The NBA has gone downhill, with many of the big-name technical players being international.

Honestly, the Uconn team could have probably beat Puerto Rico.

As far as the other sports I've seen, USA is doing fairly well. We always do pretty well in Track and Field, which I haven't seen yet.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:06:13 >
# 6 Re: USA at the Olympics
As a 19 year old(ala right in the heart of the key demo), I HATE THE OLYMPICS, it is all about who bribes whom the best, and it serves as a test bed for new drugs and every participant is a f@#$ing pro, sorry, any credibility the olympics may have had for my parents is lost on me, it is a celebration of greed, these people make money off of money hungery NBA guys and bulimic 16 year old gymnists, and if you can't beat your competition, just hire a hit man with a crow bar to the knee.

That said, give me one good reason to turn away from my NFL countdown to give a rats ass about the Olympic "Games", please.
a_greer at 2007-11-17 14:07:12 >
# 7 Re: USA at the Olympics
I don't know, the women's softball team is kicking ass.
Outsider at 2007-11-17 14:08:18 >
# 8 Re: USA at the Olympics
the olympics are popular with the locals...
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20040815/capt.olyvbb13608151659.greece_olympics_beach_volle yball_olyvbb136.jpg

:lol: very popular:lol:
a_greer at 2007-11-17 14:09:21 >
# 9 Re: USA at the Olympics
you 19 year olds are very cynical.

Yes, you will grow out of it, and will stop devoting so much mental effort in badmouthing things that really aren't conspiracies.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:10:18 >
# 10 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by Splinemodel
you 19 year olds are very cynical.

Yes, you will grow out of it, and will stop devoting so much mental effort in badmouthing things that really aren't conspiracies. I am not saying it is a conspiracy, but I have heard for the past few weeks that this thing was so big, and look at the fans filling the statium, picture above, and all of the news reports, money this and drugs that, I am just saying what I am seeing.
a_greer at 2007-11-17 14:11:19 >
# 11 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by a_greer
I am not saying it is a conspiracy...I am just saying what I am seeing.

You're obviously not looking very hard.
bunge at 2007-11-17 14:12:17 >
# 12 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by a_greer
I am not saying it is a conspiracy, but I have heard for the past few weeks that this thing was so big, and look at the fans filling the statium, picture above, and all of the news reports, money this and drugs that, I am just saying what I am seeing.

We'll have to see about the attendance situation. From what I've heard on T.V., Sunday was a Greek Orthodox holiday. Plus, a lot of Greeks take the month of August off.

But the images of all the empty seats are depressing.
k squared at 2007-11-17 14:13:15 >
# 13 Re: USA at the Olympics
Yeah, its depressing not seeing people at the olypics...what has this world come to?
dude1 at 2007-11-17 14:14:24 >
# 14 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by a_greer
I am not saying it is a conspiracy, but I have heard for the past few weeks that this thing was so big, and look at the fans filling the statium, picture above, and all of the news reports, money this and drugs that, I am just saying what I am seeing.

wow. you're sounding like a raving fool.

that picture is likely from some qualifying soccer match between two unpopular nations or something.

the rest of your dribble is just that.

enjoy the NFL...cuz that's a quality sport:rolleyes:
applenut at 2007-11-17 14:15:18 >
# 15 Re: USA at the Olympics
For many athlets, the olympic games are the goal of their life. They dedicated all their time for it : time, way of living (food, recreation ...). Some are ready to cheat to achieve their goal, but it would be absurb to think that every athlets winnng a medal are doing this. I will also add, that I knew many people who cheated (takings drugs) in order to succeed their exams, and no one blame them.

I have great respect for such people, who give the full of them for such an event. Olympics games are great, even if it turned into an huge showbizz. The spirit is still there.
Powerdoc at 2007-11-17 14:16:22 >
# 16 Re: USA at the Olympics
Back on topic...

I watched some more, US gymnastics, both were supposed to be great, but both doing poorly in prelims
besides phelps we have little to show in the pool mens or womens.
looking good on the 8 man rowing, both men and women.
and beach vollyball looks like a gold.
But this might one of the all time olympic low gold takes by America.
If only we had gotten 20 instead of 21 B-2 bombers, we could invest part of that extra 2.2 billion into our olympic effort.(the rest could save social security, or at least help) :D
I don't think we are going to improove in track and field those usally go to africa. I hope this poor performance shakes things up for a better team in 2008.
xterra48 at 2007-11-17 14:17:25 >
# 17 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by xterra48
Back on topic...

I watched some more, US gymnastics, both were supposed to be great, but both doing poorly in prelims
besides phelps we have little to show in the pool mens or womens.
looking good on the 8 man rowing, both men and women.
and beach vollyball looks like a gold.
But this might one of the all time olympic low gold takes by America.
If only we had gotten 20 instead of 21 B-2 bombers, we could invest part of that extra 2.2 billion into our olympic effort.(the rest could save social security, or at least help) :D
I don't think we are going to improove in track and field those usally go to africa. I hope this poor performance shakes things up for a better team in 2008.

um... what are you talking about?

as of last night the US was tied for total medals with 8 with China and Australia. They only had one gold buy China and Australia only have 5 and 4 respectively. It's only the third day of competition. How can you possibly make the claims you are making?

The US gymnastics men's team has the first chance to win since the 1930s.

In swimming we have Natalie Coughlin who will win severel medals alone and is all but guaranteed gold in any backstroke event.

The eights did well in the heats but I doubt they'll fair too well in the grand finals. US rowing is just weaker

Track and field is a very strong area for the US. Just because african americans perform well doesn't mean "africa" usually wins.

again...3 days of events...:rolleyes:
applenut at 2007-11-17 14:18:23 >
# 18 Re: USA at the Olympics
I think he means that african nations do extremely well in the middle to long distance running events. Given that they have a genetic disposition for the perfect runner's build, and that they are engaged in high-altitude training for most of their lives, there are lots of amazing african runners.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:19:29 >
# 19 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by Splinemodel
I think he means that african nations do extremely well in the middle to long distance running events. Given that they have a genetic disposition for the perfect runner's build, and that they are engaged in high-altitude training for most of their lives, there are lots of amazing african runners.

yes... but they hardly dominate track and field in generally. the US traditionally does quite well.
applenut at 2007-11-17 14:20:27 >
# 20 Re: USA at the Olympics
US is up to 18 total medals.

6 GOLD
6 SILVER
6 BRONZE
Outsider at 2007-11-17 14:21:28 >
# 21 Re: USA at the Olympics
but we are still third in the metal rankings! i thought that we are king of the world, or at least we act like that in forgin policy
xterra48 at 2007-11-17 14:22:24 >
# 22 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by xterra48
but we are still third in the metal rankings! i thought that we are king of the world, or at least we act like that in forgin policy

Well, we do generate more GNP than all other nations combined, so yes, that is an impressive stat. Moving on, there are lots more olympics to come, and the finesse stuff is coming to an end. In other words, the part we're bad at is coming to an end.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:23:33 >
# 23 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by k squared
We'll have to see about the attendance situation. From what I've heard on T.V., Sunday was a Greek Orthodox holiday. Plus, a lot of Greeks take the month of August off.

But the images of all the empty seats are depressing.

Hm... wouldn't their August vacations coincide perfectly with something like being a spectator at the Olympics? :err: Or is this like sabbath, and they can't even open a door for a month, or it's considered "work." ;)

I think if anyone knows about the lax security, it's the locals. And they're soft targets, as opposed to the athletes. I don't think that's the explanation, but it's an important one to consider.

Some Americans I think will be disappointed if our athletes don't win every single event. 1984 spoiled us. Really, it's nice to see real competition this year, moreso IMO than previous Olympics, and except for the blow to the collective ego of US basketball fans out there, I think we're about where where we should be with a large population that's rather wealthy and well-trained. It's nice to see other countries in there, isn't it? I mean, isn't that the point?
BuonRotto at 2007-11-17 14:24:36 >
# 24 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by bunge
You're obviously not looking very hard.

Holy f*ck, my thoughts exactly. LOL! The Olympic commitee is probably the most pompous, arrogant, cheating, stealing, bribing bunch of bastards in the world. They easily make Enron look like a non-profit charity.

It's great though, because every Olympics seems to forget all the bribing and table tilting from the previous games. Ignorance is bliss.

All that aside though, I just love watching the womens beach volleyball players running around in those shorty shorts. I swear to God, an American chick made this AMAZING play, after that, she had these SUPER erect nipples. OMG that was great T.V.
the cool gut at 2007-11-17 14:25:36 >
# 25 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by xterra48
but we are still third in the metal rankings! i thought that we are king of the world, or at least we act like that in forgin policy Wait'll track and field. We always clean up on the short-distance events. China's been kicking butt on diving and shooting, but I don't think their sprinters are so hot. Speaking of shooting, shouldn't it be a national scandal that we suck at shooting? I mean, us, the home of the NRA, where it's a god-given right to kill stuff, where I can watch skeet shooting every weekend on OLN... we can't produce even one world-class marksman? Maybe we should discharge the USMC champion marksman for two weeks every fourth year.
Towel at 2007-11-17 14:26:29 >
# 26 Re: USA at the Olympics
Tyler Hamilton won the Gold for the Time Trial. A good end to a bad year for him.
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:27:31 >
# 27 Re: USA at the Olympics
Wow, Paul Hamm was amazing tonight. Those last two routines were just incredible; it was pretty cool to watch such a significant "first-American-ever" event unfold, and in such an unlikely fashion. I wonder how close NBC stuck to reality in its production. It seemed so odd, through the entire first half of the competition, everyone was near-perfect. Then Hamm fell, and suddenly his competitors were making mistakes left and right, falling off apparati, missing easy skills, etc. It was almost too perfect a storyline. But kudos to NBC for a compelling watch.
Towel at 2007-11-17 14:28:37 >
# 28 Re: USA at the Olympics
I keep hearing about this country called "Chinese Tipai" where the fuck did that place come from:?:
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:29:32 >
# 29 Re: USA at the Olympics
well in all fairness to the chinese, taiwan for many years competed as "china"
superkarate monkeydeathcar at 2007-11-17 14:30:37 >
# 30 Re: USA at the Olympics
Good for them!:D
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:31:40 >
# 31 Re: USA at the Olympics
As always, China and US is the top.
Good for the two superpowers. :)
iKwak at 2007-11-17 14:32:40 >
# 32 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by iKwak
As always, China and US is the top.
Good for the two superpowers. :)

If by "always" you mean "in the last week," then maybe you're on to something. China has effectively replaced USSR as the major olympic competitor for the USA, but it's a bit strange, since the two nations excel in totally different spheres.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:33:43 >
# 33 Re: USA at the Olympics
Those 40 medals are quite a ridiculous number once you compare it to the EU's 120 though. Just kidding.
123 at 2007-11-17 14:34:36 >
# 34 Re: USA at the Olympics
Those 40 medals are quite a ridiculous number once you compare it to the EU's 120 though. Just kidding.

I know you're just teasing but it is impossible to compare due to too many differences.

Population is vastly in the EU's favor.

EU has more state funding of youth and Olympic COmmittee level programs.

I would imagine that the vast majority of the best male athletes in Europe are going into soccer/football which isn't played fully (with the very best) at the Olympic level. Likewise 95% of the best male US athletes are playing Hockey, (American) Football, Baseball (no MLB players) and Basketball. Only Basketball is a real summer Olympic sport and we can't even get our best freaking ballers to go to the Olympics anymore.

EU people get to qualify on a per country basis so they get a lot more athletes at the games. A quick check shows France with 342 athletes and 19 medals and the UK with 278 athletes and 17 medals. That's as many athletes just between those two countries as the US has without counting all of the other EU countries. 620 athletes and 36 medals together. Compare that to 614 athletes and 43 medals.

Plus those Brits suck at real sports. They only do well in rowing, sailing and junk like that.;)
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 14:35:40 >
# 35 Re: USA at the Olympics
If only rotting teeth were an olympic sport.
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:36:46 >
# 36 Re: USA at the Olympics
Undoubtedly rotting teeth would bump up the British medal count. But the Americans can easily counter with golds in the team and individual Trolling events.
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 14:37:47 >
# 37 Re: USA at the Olympics
It would have been funnier had you said "Obesity".
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:38:49 >
# 38 Re: USA at the Olympics
Naw. Haven't you heard? It's the age of the global economy and all the benefits that that brings. We're still number one but the Brits are getting pretty fat these days too.
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 14:39:41 >
# 39 Re: USA at the Olympics
women's gymnastics was the best

carly patterson :D
TigerWoods99 at 2007-11-17 14:40:52 >
# 40 Re: USA at the Olympics
Olympics are nice, but there are so many tournaments going on in sports...it's hard to keep an interest in them all...
Netherlands not doing too bad for a small country vs number of medals ;)
They should cut back on the number of sports, back to basics...
sparhawk at 2007-11-17 14:41:50 >
# 41 Re: USA at the Olympics
If only draining lakes and "reclaiming" the North Sea were an Olympic even.
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:42:45 >
# 42 Re: USA at the Olympics
Anyone have any thoughts on the gymnastics controversies? Quick summary:
1. Paul Hamm wins first-ever men's all-around gold for the US, after falling on his vault, by finishing with two stupendous routines. Two Koreans, who were 1-2 going into the final event, turn in lackluster final performances and finish 2-3.
2. Two days later, the Koreans file a protest. After reviewing the tapes, they find that the #3 finisher should have gotten an extra 0.1 points on his second routine (before he was even in medal contention). Korea claims that judging is biased in favor of the US.
3. Several days later, the US announces that, having reviewed the same tapes, they found that the Korean should have lost 0.2 points for several hesitations that the judges failed to penalize him for. US does not file a counter-protest.
4. Yesterday, the women's all-around silver medalist, Russian Svetlana Khorkina, announced that she was robbed of the gold by US-biased judges. No official protest filed, yet.
5. Today, the Bulgarians file a protest that one of their gymnasts was short-changed in the men's event finals.

My opinion? Bunch of frikin' crybabies. The rules are clear, and are just like baseball: protest before the next play/apparatus begins, or forever hold your peace. None of this "let's review all the tapes three days later and find anything that could possibly be rescored". It would be like the Red Sox filling a protest today, claiming that the fourth pitch to Gary Carter in Game 6 of the 1986 World Series should have been called a strike, and demanding they be awarded the championship. Shit happens, and it happens to everyone. The US men got screwed in the team all-around when the judges decided at the last moment that two of their routines would be worth several tenths less than they expected. The men changed their routines, and having never practiced them, screwed up - costing the US men the all-around gold. Too bad. Oh wait, but the judges are all US-biased, I forgot. That must explain why a US man HAS NEVER WON BEFORE, EVER. Stupid, stupid people. I totally enjoyed watching the events, too, but all this bickering really turns me off.
Towel at 2007-11-17 14:43:50 >
# 43 Re: USA at the Olympics
Sports based on judging will always have such controversies. While I didn't watch any gymnastics this olympics, what they do is very impressive to the untrained eye just like diving or figure skating or whatever. But I find it to be more like a visual exhibition than what I htink of as a sport since a lot of the scoring components are too obtuse for the common fan to bother with and at real speed the subtle differences are sometimes difficult to distinguish. I find them inferior to far more objective events like swimming or track and field et al where criterion for winning is simply finishing first or lifting the most weight or whatever the case may be.
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 14:44:55 >
# 44 Re: USA at the Olympics
Maybe it would be better to recored everything and score it off the tape?
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:45:49 >
# 45 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by ColanderOfDeath
I find them inferior to far more objective events like swimming or track and field et al where criterion for winning is simply finishing first or lifting the most weight or whatever the case may be.

Completely agree.
the cool gut at 2007-11-17 14:46:49 >
# 46 Re: USA at the Olympics
Towe- l I agree the rules are there for a reason protest while folowing the rules or dont at all.
xterra48 at 2007-11-17 14:47:58 >
# 47 Re: USA at the Olympics
I am disappointed in several sports where the judges made foul calls. Don't know how the U.S. won those Gold when the other country deserved it. It happeneded last Olympics game too.
iKwak at 2007-11-17 14:48:55 >
# 48 Re: USA at the Olympics
I am disappointed in several sports where the judges made foul calls. Don't know how the U.S. won those Gold when the other country deserved it. It happeneded last Olympics game too.

Which events are those?

Obviously Hamm deserved the Gold in the all-around since the .1 that the Korean lost due to a starting error was less than the .2 which he should have had deducted for holding four positions instead of the maximum of three.

Olympic judging has always had some questionable moments including many that have gone against the US. 72 basketball was one of the most ridiculous travesties of officiating ever. Roy Jones Jr's loss in 88 was such a joke that they had to change the freaking scoring system in boxing. I can't think of anything in major professional US sports that compares to some of the out and out fixes and unabashed biases of international Olympic judging. It's a joke.
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 14:50:00 >
# 49 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by ColanderOfDeath
Which events are those? He's still holding a grudge against Apolo Ohno. :err: There's obviously something seriously dysfunctional in the US-Korean relationship.

Speaking of judging craziness, how about the Alexi Nemov debacle tonight? Talk about heaping it on. He surely deserved a higher score than he initially got, but to let the crowd force a change in the judges' scoring? Hopefully that will be the last straw before major changes (what, I have no idea).
Towel at 2007-11-17 14:51:01 >
# 50 Re: USA at the Olympics
Alexei Nemov is in the Summer Olympics?
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 14:52:01 >
# 51 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by Towel
Speaking of judging craziness, how about the Alexi Nemov debacle tonight? Talk about heaping it on. He surely deserved a higher score than he initially got, but to let the crowd force a change in the judges' scoring? Hopefully that will be the last straw before major changes (what, I have no idea). I wonder if the Koreans will protest that event. :lol:
Outsider at 2007-11-17 14:53:03 >
# 52 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by ColanderOfDeath
Which events are those?

Obviously Hamm deserved the Gold in the all-around since the .1 that the Korean lost due to a starting error was less than the .2 which he should have had deducted for holding four positions instead of the maximum of three.



I think that the fact that Hamm clipped the judges table is reason enough not to win the Gold. How can you make a mistake like that and be called the "best in the world". You can't.

If anyone saw the high bar event, it is plain as day that the medals Hamm won were a sham.

Unfortunately Hamm will bear the brunt of this even though this is no fault of his.
the cool gut at 2007-11-17 14:54:01 >
# 53 Re: USA at the Olympics
where can i find videos of the men's 1500m and 200m races?
ipodandimac at 2007-11-17 14:55:03 >
# 54 Re: USA at the Olympics
Not on the internet.
Scott at 2007-11-17 14:56:05 >
# 55 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by ColanderOfDeath
Olympic judging has always had some questionable moments including many that have gone against the US. 72 basketball was one of the most ridiculous travesties of officiating ever. Roy Jones Jr's loss in 88 was such a joke that they had to change the freaking scoring system in boxing. I can't think of anything in major professional US sports that compares to some of the out and out fixes and unabashed biases of international Olympic judging. It's a joke.

In response to the boxing issue, I don't believe that it is much better today. The current system does not award boxers who are aggressive. It awards boxers with long arms that keep their distance from their opponents instead of those who want to 'take it to their opponent'. Although they are supposed to count body shots (above the waist), they rarely do because not all of the judges can see them as clearly as head shots. They should be taking away points from boxers who tie up their opponents whenever they get too close.
rogue master at 2007-11-17 14:57:01 >
# 56 Re: USA at the Olympics
I watched the US beat Brazil in women's soccer today.

A Brazilian player tripped on the grass and fell over. They called a foul on the US. How the hell is that a sport?
groverat at 2007-11-17 14:58:05 >
# 57 Re: USA at the Olympics
so the whole sport should be discounted because an official missed a call?
superkarate monkeydeathcar at 2007-11-17 14:59:05 >
# 58 Re: USA at the Olympics
And yet they still won. Along with softball.
Scott at 2007-11-17 15:00:10 >
# 59 Re: USA at the Olympics
Agree that the boxing system is flawed but that's beside my point which was how horrendous and biased that particular event was. The dude even apologized to Jones for winning.

As for soccer, I can't say that I care for it very much but I'll watch it on occasion. Never MLS which is ass but I'll watch the Premiership or Champions League or World Cup. But far and away the most annoying thing is the amount of diving in soccer. Totally gotten out of hand. Now, we shouldn't discount the sport because of that, but we acknowledge in the interests of full disclosure that it has been usurped by pussies. I'd watch lesbo porn and not soccer if I wanted to see pussy diving.
ColanderOfDeath at 2007-11-17 15:01:12 >
# 60 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by groverat
I watched the US beat Brazil in women's soccer today.

A Brazilian player tripped on the grass and fell over. They called a foul on the US. How the hell is that a sport?

Heh heh. It's nothing like Maradona's "Hand of God" play in 86.
Splinemodel at 2007-11-17 15:02:04 >
# 61 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by Splinemodel
As far as basketball is concerned, it would be very easy for america to dominate the thing entirely. But the team that was picked is a bunch of lazy streetballers plus Duncan and Iverson. The NBA has gone downhill, with many of the big-name technical players being international.

Honestly, the Uconn team could have probably beat Puerto Rico.

As far as the other sports I've seen, USA is doing fairly well. We always do pretty well in Track and Field, which I haven't seen yet.

This is a good point. I think we should take the national championship basketball team (in the respective year) to represent the US. I think this team with the exception of Duncan is a complete embarassment and its only purpose is to HOPEFULLY teach a couple of kids out there that you cant just be a talented 1 on 1 street baller and be a great player in the NBA. It requires the mastery of all disciplines including the rarely seen art of defense and something known as passing.
Playmaker at 2007-11-17 15:03:14 >
# 62 Re: USA at the Olympics
if the u.s. would have sent the pistons no international team would have scored 50 points.
the pistons sent a pretty large message to the NBA last year, i think team play and fundamentals will be returning.
streetballers (of whom iverson is king) are on the way out, foreign players are becoming more dominant.
superkarate monkeydeathcar at 2007-11-17 15:04:10 >
# 63 Re: USA at the Olympics
Was I seeing things, or did the Greeks build the world's largest joint at olympic stadium? No wonder the Games went so happily. :smokey:
Towel at 2007-11-17 15:05:13 >
# 64 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by superkarate monkeydeathcar
if the u.s. would have sent the pistons no international team would have scored 50 points.
the pistons sent a pretty large message to the NBA last year, i think team play and fundamentals will be returning.
streetballers (of whom iverson is king) are on the way out, foreign players are becoming more dominant.

Actually, I think the US should send the NCAA champions, not the pros. And they still wouldn't be beat.
tonton at 2007-11-17 15:06:13 >
# 65 Re: USA at the Olympics
On the topic of the gymnastics debacle, it's entirely FIG's fault. The Koreans can protest all they want, but the IOC certified the final results based on FIG officiating. The IOC can't change the results of any particular event, not even when a crazy Irishman tackles you to the ground while you lead the Marathon.

FIG is to blame for pretty much everything. Not one, but three judges made the same mistake. Hamm said he would give the medal if FIG forced the issue. Instead, they went the spineless route and made no decision and tried to put everything on Hamm's shoulders.

If the IOC isn't responsible, and FIG is too chicken to force the issue, why should Hamm give up the medal on his own accord?

The only variation of this situation in which I would award an additional gold medal would be if the Korean gymnast in question had gone last and if the scoring error had appeared there. Hamm, not the Korean, went last.
Eugene at 2007-11-17 15:07:10 >
# 66 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by Towel
Was I seeing things, or did the Greeks build the world's largest joint at olympic stadium? No wonder the Games went so happily. :smokey:
The games far exceeded my expectations. In fact, it was probably the best I can remember as far as atmosphere goes. Beijing 2008 has a huge task ahead of it if it ants to live up to Athens 2004. I don't think it can be done...if the cheesy teaser we got in the closing ceremonies is any indication, I tihnk I'm going to be very disappointed.

I don't want to see pop looking girls who can't dance in sync playing the erhu, nor do I want to see a generic wushu, sword dance or ribbon dance demonstration...and find a little girl who can lip sync her pre-recording in tune...

I'm half expecting multicolored dancing terra cotta soldiers.
Eugene at 2007-11-17 15:08:09 >
# 67 Re: USA at the Olympics
They mentioned during the closing ceremonies that China is in a much better position now for 2008 than Greece was earlier this year.

I had an idea about gymnastics and scoring. Why couldn't it scored like diving? Each routine has a preset difficulty accumulated from the various flips, spins, releases, etc. After the routine eliminate the highest and lowest scores from the judges, then add the remaining scores. Finally multiply that sum by the difficulty. This would give a much larger variation on scoring. This wouldn't get rid of errors, but I think it would make scoring a little less subjective as you could easily break down each part of the routine.
rogue master at 2007-11-17 15:09:11 >
# 68 Re: USA at the Olympics
Originally posted by rogue master
They mentioned during the closing ceremonies that China is in a much better position now for 2008 than Greece was earlier this year.
Preparedness and presentation are two different things altogether.

Lillehammer was a great example of a wonderfully presented games despite new 2-year stagger which left them no time to prepare. Atlanta was remarkably prepared, but also remarkably tacky.
Eugene at 2007-11-17 15:10:16 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]