newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
What other industries could stand to have a specific Markup Language?
Anybody want to write code for an AppleInsiderXL?
What would THAT be?
[284 byte] By [drewprops] at [2007-11-15 12:21:22] 
Everybody's doing it, from the sports industry to the International Rock Excavation Data Exchange Standard committee.
What other industries could stand to have a specific Markup Language?
Anybody want to write code for an AppleInsiderXL?
What would THAT be?
# 1 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
It might be nice to move DICOM to XML. Much more flexibility.Scott at 2007-11-17 14:48:34 >
# 2 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
Here is a few:<rant>
<rumor>
<confirmed>
<troll>
<satire>
<smiley type=" ">
<code>
<url>
<true>
<false>
<windoze>
<releaseNextTuesday>
<macworld>
<name>
<rating>
<locked>
Coupled with a RSS DTD we could create an AppleInsider Rich Site Summary for the top posts.
jante99 at 2007-11-17 14:49:35 >
# 3 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
here are a few more...<MakingPlastics>
<HijackThreadTopic>
<EmanPost> (for those who are counting)
<ModeratorSmackDown>
<RedundantThread>
<SteveJobsTopic>
Is there any reason to suspect that Adobe might have need of a markup language?
To what purpose? There are weather-related RSS feeds, but is there a meteorological markup language?
drewprops at 2007-11-17 14:50:33 >
# 4 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
[quote]Originally posted by drewprops:<strong><MakingPlastics>
</strong><hr></blockquote>
sweet genius <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
frawgz at 2007-11-17 14:51:38 >
# 5 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages - AppleInsiderAirSluf at 2007-11-17 14:52:37 >
# 6 Re: newest fadXL : industry specific Markup Languages
u forgot at least one...<putting way to much thought into a quote by steve jobs>
'options'
</putting way to much thought into a quote by steve jobs>
ast3r3x at 2007-11-17 14:53:36 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]