Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!

I was wondering why my 40GB iPod doesn't hold 10,000 songs like Apple says it should.

One reason is I have some hour-long DJ mixes on it that count as single songs. Another is that the "40GB" iPod has only 37GB of useable disk space.

But the main reason is that lots of my music files were compressed at very high bitrates that waste disk space. These files (maybe 60-70% of my collection) were 2 to 10 times as big as they need to be.

You can compress these files to a lower bitrate and save disk space:

In iTunes, go to Edit -- Preferences -- Importing.

Select "Import Using MP3 Encoder", and set Setting to the bitrate of your choice.

(Note: 192 and 160 are crazy high quality. 128 is near-CD quality. On an iPod, you can't tell the difference. On a high-end audio system in ideal listening conditions, you might be able to tell. I certainly can't tell the difference in sound between my 128 kbps files and my higher-bitrate files.)

In your music library, view the Bit Rate information for your songs and sort them by Bit Rate. You may see some songs have bit rates of 320 kbps or even as high as 1400+ kbps (which is essentially uncompressed).

Select the high bit rate songs (say, everything over 192 kbps, for example).

Then go to Advanced -- Convert Selection to MP3.

iTunes will create new versions of the selected files at the bitrate you chose. If you are doing thousands of songs, this will take a very long time. Let the computer work on it overnight.

Finally, delete the original high bit rate versions of the songs and you are left with your new, compressed files.

This all adds up to massive disk space savings. By compressing all my higher-than-192 kbps files down to 192, I saved about 21GB on my 104 GB library. If I compressed everything above 128 kbps down to 128, I would save about another 17 GB. My music collection would take up only 60% as much disk space as it did before.

It all adds up to more songs fitting on your hard disk and your iPod, as well as faster file transfer times (because the files are smaller). Check it out.
[2211 byte] By [Skep] at [2007-11-9 17:45:57]
# 1 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
If you convert an already compressed file you will lose quality--it is better to re-rip your cds.
Juanpod at 2007-11-15 16:44:08 >
# 2 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
Point taken, although I don't notice a difference on files I re-compressed from 320 kbps to 192 kbps.
Skep at 2007-11-15 16:45:09 >
# 3 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
I'm listening to my computer's speakers and I can't tell the difference. But I'm willing to believe that I would hear the difference if I played it through my stereo system.

Looks like it's time to start re-ripping at 192... or is 160 or 128 a better choice?
Skep at 2007-11-15 16:46:07 >
# 4 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
Originally posted by stark23x
You would with high-end headphones. I'm almost repulsed by the quality of some of my digital music now.

What are considered high-end headphones? Are the Shures and Entymotics high-end or the headphones that are even more expensive than those? Just curious.
yashan at 2007-11-15 16:47:13 >
# 5 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
Yeah, if you want to really see how good your files are, you could hook up your computer via digital cable to an integrated amp or component system and serious speakers, which I have done.

I have a pretty decent receiver (cost about $2,000) and a pair of Linn Katan bookshelf speakers mounted on specially-designed stands.

Just listening casually, without doing A/B comparisons, I don't hear a noticeable difference between MP3's and CD's. And of course, if you are playing your music at a party where people are making noise, it's totally impossible to tell any difference.

But just for the records, what bitrate do you all think offers the best combo of quality versus file size? I am thinking 128 might be it, but I am curious to see what others think.
Skep at 2007-11-15 16:48:12 >
# 6 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
Originally posted by Skep
But just for the records, what bitrate do you all think offers the best combo of quality versus file size? I am thinking 128 might be it, but I am curious to see what others think. For me I'd say 128 kbps AAC is great if you aren't listening through expensive gear in a sonically neutral environment. If you are, then 192 kbps AAC (or 256 kbps MP3) is probably adequate. Although in that case, you probably won't settle for anything less than uncompressed anyway.
HiRez at 2007-11-15 16:49:20 >
# 7 Re: Compress files in iTunes -- save disk space!
Yup, 256AAC does sound bad.

I did lots of comparisons between the rates before ripping my library and settled on 224AAC, which sounds much better than 256 -- depsite the lower rate. But blind testing doesn't lie.

You say you have a 40gig -- why not just go with 320AAC? That was the only rate that rivalled 224AAC to my ears, and you've got lots of space.
Piranhahaha at 2007-11-15 16:50:13 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]