Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all

Ok I was looking at the zune today, and I realized that it is not, in any way impressive. Its like a mix of current iPod features, and the new features that everyone on here talked about in the future iPods section

Current iPod features:
Photo and video capabilities
Rectangular shape
White and black colors (also brown but how grosss is that)
wheel (what a rip off of ipod)
wheel and screen placement very similar to ipod
uses iTunes

Features discussed on here
horizontal orientation
wireless sharing
[552 byte] By [ipodmini868] at [2007-11-11 14:08:06]
# 1 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
As I posted elsewhere:

I saw two Zune's while out today, 1 at CompUSA (Black) and 1 at Fry's (White). Both were on display and both were dead. Without making any commentary on the Zune's user interface, I found the unit itself to be rather disappointing. While it was roughly the same size as an iPod, it seemed larger, possibly due to the size of the screen. What really surprised me was the outer appearance of the Zune though. In comparison to the iPod and other players out there (Creative, SanDisk and so on), the Zune was physically ugly. The outer layer of plastic looked cheap. It is obvious that MS is trying to avoid the whole issue of scratches and blemishes on the Zune's surface, but they seemed to miss the ball on the aesthetic idea, it just looked tacky. Maybe that's not a selling point for many. Just my first impression.
baggss at 2007-11-15 17:56:54 >
# 2 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Ok I was looking at the zune today, and I realized that it is not, in any way impressive. Its like a mix of current iPod features, and the new features that everyone on here talked about in the future iPods section

Current iPod features:
Photo and video capabilities
Rectangular shape
White and black colors (also brown but how grosss is that)
wheel (what a rip off of ipod)
wheel and screen placement very similar to ipod
uses iTunes

Features discussed on here
horizontal orientation
wireless sharing

Bigger screen means better photo and video. I've seen it, it's better in that regard.

Rectangular shape - Yeah, let's design a hexagonal MP3 player... And make the screen a circle while we're at it.

Brown is the best Zune color, and from the ads I've seen, their flagship.

The wheel is just a D-Pad. No scrolling. Not a ripoff.

Screen on top. Controls on bottom. YOU'RE RIGHT! That is just like an iPod. And cellphones. And laptops. And the rare universal remote with a screen. And every other mainstream technology product from the last hundred years.

The Zune doesn't use iTunes. It's software is worse. This is the one point we agree upon.

And the new stuff. Is new. And, it's the primary aspect of the Zune that Microsoft is counting on to make it popular. If these forums gave Microsoft their ideas, good for them. Go buy a Zune since it has the features we wanted in a new iPod before the iPod itself does. And, for what it's worth, you forgot FM radio.

Edit: Baggss - In my opinion, it's the best looking DAP next to the iPod. As far as size goes, I'm used to my 60 gig iPod Photo, so the Zune doesn't really faze me.
papayaninja at 2007-11-15 17:57:54 >
# 3 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Let's see how long this thread lasts....
baggss at 2007-11-15 17:58:52 >
# 4 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
i saw the zune at mejier and it is so clunky and big..the black and blue tint does look good though!
Eric Lewis at 2007-11-15 17:59:58 >
# 5 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I dont see why it was made as an iPod killer if it isnt any better than the iPod... Kind of silly, they should have atleast made it better.

I honestly do like the ability to choose your background, I think thats awsome... But thats about it... Not enough to kill the iPod.

I havent seen one in person yet though, but from what I see... I dont see any innovation either, just another mp3 player on the market.
KillingKlowns at 2007-11-15 18:00:57 >
# 6 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
i saw the zune at mejier and it is so clunky and big..the black and blue tint does look good though!

I left that blue tint around the edges out of my earlier post as I thought it may have just been the lighting in the stores. I did notice it though and found it sort of odd. It must be the material they used to make the outer shell. Now if it glowed, that would be cool.
baggss at 2007-11-15 18:01:55 >
# 7 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
If anything the Zune is over hyped for what its worth

It was just in the news media because it was made by microsoft

I dont see any news colums about players from iAudio or Creative, which in comparison, are remarkably better than the zune IMHO

But as someone posted earlier, it is just another DAP on the market
mrdantownsend at 2007-11-15 18:02:59 >
# 8 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I played with a working Zune at Target today. The interface looked better than any DAP I've seen, and it was easy enough to use. I was constantly trying to scroll the d-pad, though! The big screen made it very readable for me (a big problem with my 4G). The exterior was completely boxed in some sort of security shell, so I couldn't really see what it was like.

Its strange that they've distributed non-functional demo models, though. Target had one of those, too.

It seems like every time someone comes out with a DAP, people rip on it for having common features and a screen over the controls (like every other DAP, but it will be called "copying the iPod"). Get over it! If you like your iPod, that's great...it doesn't mean you have to rip on the competition for having the same features (many of which pre-date the iPod!).

If you want to rip on it, rip on it for the software! ;)
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:04:01 >
# 9 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
i played with a working one too...target i believe also
i thought it was easy to use, nice screen and everything however
i didnt like the back button...way too small and i think the ipod menu button is far easier to hit to go back...my hand just couldnt grace it i had to search and make sure i hit it ...really bothered me for the twenty seconds i played with it
mizzle at 2007-11-15 18:04:59 >
# 10 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Are Microsoft pushing this player outside of North America? I've no seen no advertisements here at all.
neb at 2007-11-15 18:05:59 >
# 11 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
it's too early to call. we need to keep watch how zune will perform well next quarter. I say the first quarter 2007?

I can see their marketing is totally doom. MS doesn't have international operating office yet. I guess that it will be slowly launched coming several months. but selling device itself shouldn't be this way. at least they have to sell device no matter what even though additional service will be added later. the news says 2008 for international. what? are you kidding? when the sale will go like that way, zune will never ever catch up the tale of ipod. in 2008, Apple will bring on the most sleek, eye poping ipod again. at that time, MS just start to sell it internationally? I can see how they will fail.
archurban at 2007-11-15 18:06:57 >
# 12 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
it's only for release in US - europe is slated for sometime mid 2007 apparently and in Aus.....who knows!!

there's baby steps and bad planning - not sure which this falls into right now!
yinyang at 2007-11-15 18:08:06 >
# 13 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Does that suggest they had neither the confidence or the determination needed for a worldwide universal release? I would have likened this method to a product being released in an emerging market, and not one which is designed to challenge the old regime. O well, maybe I'm wrong.
neb at 2007-11-15 18:09:01 >
# 14 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
neb,
If we ask Jackonicko nicely perhaps he'll stick his Zune in the post (Ooooer Matron...) and we can play with it (fnurr fnurr) then post it on to the next interested 'lounger'. Will it work on W98?....
Bob at 2007-11-15 18:10:07 >
# 15 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Don't tempt me.....

I could quite happily stick my small but hard pink toy in the slot....
Jackonicko at 2007-11-15 18:11:10 >
# 16 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
it's only for release in US - europe is slated for sometime mid 2007 apparently and in Aus.....who knows!!

there's baby steps and bad planning - not sure which this falls into right now!

I heard '08 for Australia.
melsmusic at 2007-11-15 18:12:03 >
# 17 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I heard '08 for Australia.Damn, that's so long.........:( ;)
jedk at 2007-11-15 18:13:11 >
# 18 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
out 08 release..by then ipods will be 200gb, bluetooth and everything u need!
Eric Lewis at 2007-11-15 18:14:04 >
# 19 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
To be fair, I think we also need to get some perspective on hype versus reality...

As iPod owners, we're all aware of the hype that usually gets ramped up over anticipated iPod release dates, new features, and so forth, but these are a result of the rumour mill, and almost never represent the official views of Apple. Most of us learned a long time ago to take these things with a bag of salt.

To be fair, I don't recall Microsoft ever saying or even implying that the Zune is intended to be an "iPod killer" in it's current form. Certainly, they're trying to replicate the iPod's success, and are therefore trying to fit the Zune into the "iPod space", but as of today I think they're well aware that they're not going to topple the iPod with this first-generation Zune.

Instead, what we have are the pundits and pro-iPod vs anti-iPod groups who are stoking the fires and trying to suggest that the Zune is something it's clearly not (in a good OR bad way).

Again, if this weren't a Microsoft product we would barely have noticed it. On the other hand, because it's a Microsoft product, from a company who is traditionally viewed as the primary rival to Apple, people are suddenly suggesting that it's Microsoft's "final solution" to the iPod, as opposed to just another DAP that really just represents a rather trepidatious foray of a big company into a new market space.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 18:15:13 >
# 20 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I think the real strongpoint is the interface, and 99% of that is directly copied from the Toshiba Gigabeat S, which IMO looks a whole lot better. And instead of being larger, it's smaller than the iPod. It's also cheaper than the iPod.. you can find the 30GB model for $200-ish online.

Check it out.

http://reviews.cnet.com/Toshiba_Gigabeat_S_MES30VW_30GB_white/4505-6499_7-31660763.html
TheJosher at 2007-11-15 18:16:15 >
# 21 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Is still think that microsoft looked inside the box for the zune. Instead of coming out with shocking features no one excpected, they simply improved upon what wa already on the market.
ipodmini868 at 2007-11-15 18:17:10 >
# 22 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Is still think that microsoft looked inside the box for the zune. Instead of coming out with shocking features no one excpected, they simply improved upon what wa already on the market.

So you're arguing that it's bad, but also that it's an improvement? I guess I'm just confused about what point you're trying to make.
papayaninja at 2007-11-15 18:18:08 >
# 23 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I am turned off by the fact that you have to turn the unit to appreciate the bigger screen over the ipod, not a very good design if you plan to mount the Zune in your car or docking station.

But as far as the rubberized finish, I find that I am on the fence. The ipod is way too delicate to drop into your bag/pocket without getting scratched. If you care about that then the Zune has the advantage. One might argue that you can just get a case for the iPod, while that is true, unless it is a protective film or clear case, the aesthetics of the iPod are hidden by the 3rd party case that the user has chosen. So, in alot of cases, aesthetics are determined by the case, and not the iPod. This is advantageous in that consumers can choose and change the aesthetics simple by buying a new case. BUT cases can be produced for the Zune as well... furthermore de-emphasizing the core aesthetics of the unit itself for both Zune and iPod. The advantage that Zune has is that you don't necessarily need a case if you are worried about scratches (unless you are worried about the screen, in which case a protective film will work as well). And even if were to get a case, primary aesthetics would then be determined by the case, and not the unit, just like the ipod.

I also see Zune's user interface much better than the iPod with instant shuffle and a directional pad instead of the clickwheel. The clickwheel is actually very non-ergonomic, if you consider the fact that circular motions by your finger(s) is not as efficient as holding down a button to scroll. I can see why many people would disagree with this because they are used to using the clickwheel, but give it an honest try and see which one requires more work and which one is easier to navigate while jogging/driving/walking.

There are MANY advantages to iPod, but the clickwheel and aesthetics are questionable, and more subjective than they appear to be. That's my take on it, and unless they fix other quirks I don't like about the Zune, I'll be keeping my ipod... but I'll be watching what happens next.
JMG at 2007-11-15 18:19:19 >
# 24 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I think the real strongpoint is the interface, and 99% of that is directly copied from the Toshiba Gigabeat S, which IMO looks a whole lot better. And instead of being larger, it's smaller than the iPod. It's also cheaper than the iPod.. you can find the 30GB model for $200-ish online.

Check it out.

http://reviews.cnet.com/Toshiba_Gigabeat_S_MES30VW_30GB_white/4505-6499_7-31660763.html

The Gigabeat is the Zune's predecessor much like the Power Bookis the Macbook Pro's only they didn't brand it Micro$oft. So there really isn't anything wrong with the fact that they copied the Gigabeat, because it's the same people.
JMG at 2007-11-15 18:20:18 >
# 25 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
868,

I see no improvements over what's out there, to be honest.

Worse sound, a poor UI (I for one far prefer a progressively geared wheel to a D pad), and unreliable and buggy. Some improvement.

JMG,

I'm a grown up. I'm used to taking care of my gear. I can choose to use a case and be carefree, or not do so and baby it.

The Zune will never, ever look good, because without a jacket/case it looks dreadful - far, far worse in the flesh than in photos.
Jackonicko at 2007-11-15 18:21:12 >
# 26 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
The Gigabeat is the Zune's predecessor much like the Power Bookis the Macbook Pro's only they didn't brand it Micro$oft. So there really isn't anything wrong with the fact that they copied the Gigabeat, because it's the same people.

I know that.. I'm just saying that they didn't do anything new with the interface that hasn't already been done in some form before.

I also think the Gigabeat looks a lot better than the Zune.. and it's scratch resistant at the same time. If the S model was out when I was purchasing my mp3 player I probably would have went with it instead of my current iPod. (I was considering the older Gigabeat and the iPod)

Josh
TheJosher at 2007-11-15 18:22:12 >
# 27 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
The Zune will never, ever look good, because without a jacket/case it looks dreadful - far, far worse in the flesh than in photos.

And this was exactly what I found out. The photos don't do it justice. In person it is downrite dreadful to my eyes.
musichound at 2007-11-15 18:23:18 >
# 28 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Did anyone else notice that on the back bottom of the Zune it says: "Hello from Redmond"?
baggss at 2007-11-15 18:24:23 >
# 29 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
When I turned mine over, I was fully expecting to see:

"Sucker!"
Jackonicko at 2007-11-15 18:25:18 >
# 30 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
You have my address...
Bob at 2007-11-15 18:26:20 >
# 31 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Did anyone else notice that on the back bottom of the Zune it says: "Hello from Redmond"?

It actually says "Hello from Seattle" Which some reviewers have noted is odd since, of course Microsoft is located in Redmond.
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 18:27:20 >
# 32 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Hmm, anagrams....

FART HOLE SMELT LO....
Bob at 2007-11-15 18:28:24 >
# 33 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
It actually says "Hello from Seattle" Which some reviewers have noted is odd since, of course Microsoft is located in Redmond.

Could it be because this is where the Zune launch party was held and where Bill Gates appeared?
musichound at 2007-11-15 18:29:25 >
# 34 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Could it be because this is where the Zune launch party was held and where Bill Gates appeared?

No idea. I find it difficult to understand anything now a days :)
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 18:30:29 >
# 35 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
i saw the zune at mejier and it is so clunky and big..the black and blue tint does look good though!

I've read where you can modify the Zune by installing a Toshiba 80GB HDD, and do not have to modify the plastic casing. You just remove a bracket from the Zune that held the 30GB HDD.

Then you have a 80GB Zune that's the same thickness as the 80GB iPod. It's still a little longer than the iPod, tho.
HappyDAPer at 2007-11-15 18:31:23 >
# 36 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Then you have a 80GB Zune that's the same thickness as the 80GB iPod. It's still a little longer than the iPod, tho.

I don't see how this is possible. As is, the Zune is .6 inches thick. The 80gb iPod is .55 inches... Changing out the hard drive won't make it thinner as I'm sure just changing hard drives doesn't change the thickness of the case. That .05 inches won't change (though likely negligible).
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 18:32:24 >
# 37 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Then you have a 80GB Zune that's the same thickness as the 80GB iPod. It's still a little longer than the iPod, tho.It would also be well over $500.
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:33:27 >
# 38 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
It would also be well over $500.

or about as much as the 1st gen 5GB iPod was. ;)

They are actually selling the 80GB HDD for $240.00, which would make your total purchase, with a $233.00 Zune from amazon.com, just under $500.00 with tax. Still more than the $350.00 80GB iPod, but isn't brown worth it? :D

courtesy of iPodMods (http://www.ipodmods.com/shop/zune-repair-guides.html)

well, I guess there would be a 0.05" difference....worthy of an outcry when the larger player is 30GB, but not when both have the same capacity. A difference of 0.05" is hard to see even looking at them side by side.....
HappyDAPer at 2007-11-15 18:34:30 >
# 39 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
.05 in is || or so wide. (really a little less)
LukeA at 2007-11-15 18:35:29 >
# 40 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
.05 in is || or so wide. (really a little less)

Yes, but not the SAME thickness as the 80GB is all I'm saying.
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 18:36:36 >
# 41 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Yes, but not the SAME thickness as the 80GB is all I'm saying.You're really going to argue over 5/100th of an inch?
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:37:30 >
# 42 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
You're really going to argue over 5/100th of an inch?
That's the thickness of 10 ordinary sheets of paper.
LukeA at 2007-11-15 18:38:34 >
# 43 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
You're really going to argue over 5/100th of an inch?

No, I'm not going to argue (I said originally it is "likely negligible), I'm just saying we shouldn't say it's the same depth when it's not. :) Even if it's negligible.

;)
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 18:39:39 >
# 44 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I had the chance to play with a working Zune today. The store had all 3 colors and I have to admit, the brown one does look like a turd. The blue ring around the edge looks especially crappy with the brown, no pun intended. I thought the plastic casing looked rather cheap, more like a toy than a $250 electronics device. I kept wondering what would happen if I bounced it off some concrete once or twice. The iPod looks rather fragile with the chrome and the shiney face, but the Zune looks like you chuck it a brick wall 5 or 6 times, although I suspect doing so once would have the same result as if you chucked an iPod at a brick wall.

The interface IS slick, but not enough to to "WOW" me. Navigation was smooth, and one would hope that third parties start making better themes than the 3 lame ones included. It highlighted the difference between it and the iPod and made appreciate the iPods clean and uncluttered background, a lesson I have learned with my Palm Treo 700P recently too. I always sort of thought a background image on my iPod or Palm would look cool, but after trying it on my Treo and on the Zune, I'm glad the iPod doesn't have it. In short, the background on the Zune didn't endear it me and simply, again IMHO, made it look more cluttered.

I don't see the up and down scrolling as any more intuitive than the iPods scroll wheel, but I don't find it any less intuitive either, it would just require some getting used to after an iPod. I found my self continually trying to scroll it though. I don't like turning it sideways to watch video, I found it somewhat uncomfortable as the ergonomics of the grip change and the control buttons are now turned the other way around and you have to know where they they are or you end up searching for the right one either randomly or by turning the unit upright. That would take some getting used to as well. That's likely not a huge show stopper, but something that could be overcome by having a virtual touch screen interface that would reorientate the buttons when you move the unit between positions. From a design standpoint it sucks, as the user interface is different depending on how you hold it. The screen color was nice, but not any nicer, IMHO, than my iPods screen and I didn't see the larger screen as a real bonus, again because of the ergonomics of holding the unit sideway.

On as side note, a buddy of mine was with me. He also has an iPod that he recently purchased. He was looking at one of them and I asked him what he though, he said he thought the Zune was nice but still said he was happy with his iPod. I asked him why and he said he really liked his iPod because there were a TON of accessories for it, everything he could imagine. His next comment was what sort of made me stop and thing. He said that this was the same reason he had not yet switched to a Mac. I asked him what he meant and he said that he was still using Windows because there was just so much stuff for it. Everywhere you go, there are Windows programs and games but you have to go to certain stores to find anything for a Mac. Now as a long time Mac user my initial thought was, yeah but a lot of that Windows software is crap to begin with. I didn't say it though (which IS odd for me), as he had wandered over to a 20 inch iMac and started playing with it.

His comment got me to thinking and made me wonder if maybe, just maybe, Apple had "out Microsofted" Microsoft in the DAP market? I mean, there are going to be some who find the Zune an excellent player, and there are many fans of Creative and Sandisk, among others, here at iLounge, but if an average guy (my friend) simply thinks that the best thing to go with is the one that has "the most stuff" can MS or Creative or anyone really catch up? Does the iPod have the momentum to simply remain the standard because of so much 3rd party support? Sure there are cases for Creative products, just like there are for the Zune, but how many get made will be directly related to how many units sell. If Creative sold more, there would be more "stuff" for it. The same is true for the Zune. Now to be honest, I'm not sure if I believe that Apple really has "out Miscrosofted" Microsoft in the DAP market, but being a long time Mac user and an early iPod adopter, I had never really looked at this from my friends point of view. Zune sales over the upcoming Christmas season and the next year or so will tell us more, especially when Apple releases "the next big thing".

BTW, the store I was in said they have had the Zunes for a couple of weeks and have sold exactly 2.
baggss at 2007-11-15 18:40:33 >
# 45 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I've said in the past that the iPod is now somewhat like Windows; its the safe choice, the one everybody knows, the one that has the widest support and if any new peripheral comes up it will most likely be for the market leader first (if not exclusively). As a (relatively) late adopter, it was a very similar choice. If I get another iPod, it'll be because it "just works", even though I know I can navigate a lot quicker, do a lot of cool things, and pay less with other DAPs.

I get about as excited about the iPod as I do about Windows. Neither are really my ideal for the task, but I've seen the competition and I don't want to bother with it.
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:41:32 >
# 46 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I've been spending some time over the past couple of days looking into new MP3 players. The 20GB on my 4G is just killing me; anytime I want to add something I have to delete something else!

Testing the Zune really had me interested in a D-pad, but an mere 10GB extra is not what I'm looking for. So I looked into the 60GB Toshiba Gigabeat S, which I understand is basically a Zune (internally). I checked the mygigabeat forum on the S series.

All I can say is "wow". The main topic of discussion seems to be the manner in which their Gigabeat died (mostly a neverending string of battery problems). If the Zune is anything like that piece of junk, you guys will have a lot more to rejoice about in the coming months!
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:42:42 >
# 47 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
How much is the 60GB Gigabeat compared to the, I suppose you'd have to say 80GB ipod, since they deleted the 60GB?
melsmusic at 2007-11-15 18:43:38 >
# 48 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
How much is the 60GB Gigabeat compared to the, I suppose you'd have to say 80GB ipod, since they deleted the 60GB?The Gigabeat is $72 less on Amazon. ($260 vs $332). It would be quite a deal if it was reliable.
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:44:41 >
# 49 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
The Gigabeat is $72 less on Amazon. ($260 vs $332). It would be quite a deal if it was reliable.

That's 20 gig less though?

If so, gig for gig the ipod is still better value.

$260/60 = $4.33 per gig

$332/80 = $4.15 per gig

I find the ipod prices hard to beat over here.
melsmusic at 2007-11-15 18:45:42 >
# 50 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
I had the chance to play with a working Zune today. The store had all 3 colors and I have to admit, the brown one does look like a turd. The blue ring around the edge looks especially crappy with the brown, no pun intended.

I thought the double shot effect for the brown Zune was yellow or green, and the Black one was blue??:confused:
HappyDAPer at 2007-11-15 18:46:42 >
# 51 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
No, you can still tell it's blue, the shading simply changes with the color.
baggss at 2007-11-15 18:47:44 >
# 52 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Here is a review from extremetech.com...never heard of them before...

Linky ( http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2061973,00.asp)
HappyDAPer at 2007-11-15 18:48:41 >
# 53 Re: Zune=Not impressive or innovative at all
Here is a review from extremetech.com.He obviously didn't get the memo that the "objective" reviewer is supposed to hate the Zune. Not just be underwhelmed by it, not just dislike it, but hate it.
bdb at 2007-11-15 18:49:41 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]