Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

The official iPhone discussion thread

Well the "wide-screen" "video" "iphone" is here. Its very nice, but not $600 nice...:eek: It will sell like mad i'm sure, but i'll wait for a cheaper model...

Would have been nice to have a model with no phone and add 80gb harddrive though... I'd buy that now...

Sponge
[307 byte] By [ltspongebob] at [2007-11-11 15:30:23]
# 1 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
U want it good and u want it cheap? :D

Meh either, but that's 'cuz am not into videos.

It's gonna make the video kids and touch screen fans very happy though, *if* they can afford it!

I think I'd wait for next year's iPhone-mini. Just phone+music is all I need.
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:00:35 >
# 2 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
....i think that the 600 dollar price tag makes it easier to wait and see if there are any glitches that need to be worked out with it, wait for it to go to like verizon or not. that isn't that big of a deal either way. plus, the price will go down greatly after some time.

i think it's one of the most amazing things i've ever seen in cell phones. but still not worth 600 dollars. and only 8gbs?

I'll wait for the 100+gb 6g iPod. whenever that comes out.

Very nice though...

edit : but what about that touch screen? another reason to wait it out. see how the screen reacts to fingers and possible scratches. hopefully not as easily scratched as the black iPod video.
robenco18 at 2007-11-15 13:01:35 >
# 3 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I'll wait for the 100+gb 6g iPod. whenever that comes out.

You hit the nail on the head. I have to say that merge calls and visual voicemail look pretty cool. I just don't have any need for a phone, any money, or any half-way decent Cingular coverage, otherwise I'd be all over it.
papayaninja at 2007-11-15 13:02:33 >
# 4 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I want that!

Except not a phone! Just the video ipod!

And not at that price tag!
bootsie at 2007-11-15 13:03:38 >
# 5 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I don't need a cell phone. Let alone a $600 cell phone that you're bound to keep paying for service for 2 years.

I say screw the phone and release the iVid or something that'll be just an iPod, but wide/touchscreen.
TheJosher at 2007-11-15 13:04:37 >
# 6 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I wonder if u can buy the thing wo Cingular service. So if ur not using the phone, why force u into a contract?

However, carrying two gadgets when u can have one is tempting eh?
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:05:36 >
# 7 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
All that capability and potential, and not enough space to do anything with it. 4G, 8G? And how much space will the OS take up? I don't understand. It's like they built a Lamborghini with a 6 ounce gas tank.
Hanafuda at 2007-11-15 13:06:31 >
# 8 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well now that Steve has said this is the finest iPod he's ever made, does that mean that any further iPod upgrade could be exactly the same without the phone? I mean if you've already made the jump to widescreen, you HAVE to apply it to video. But at only 8G, the iPhone really isn't a widescreen video player.
ChipT at 2007-11-15 13:07:34 >
# 9 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
You might be able to buy it contract less, but then you're looking at an even higher price. All for 8GB? I'll pass.

If they replaced the current 5G line-up with this model, but with an HD and at roughly the same price I'd jump in a second.
TheJosher at 2007-11-15 13:08:42 >
# 10 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
All that capability and potential, and not enough space to do anything with it. 4G, 8G? And how much space will the OS take up? I don't understand. It's like they built a Lamborghini with a 6 ounce gas tank.
Oh right, missed that. A video iPod with 8 gig? dang, that's barely enough for music.

But u know what gangs, now that the wide screen hardware and touch screen is out, they just need to make a slightly thicker casing and make it into a AV-only iPod with a big HD. AND THE ADVENTURE continues on all predictions on how the 6G looks like!
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:09:43 >
# 11 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I WANT THIS!!!!

I'm gonna wait till a few months after it is released before I buy. So far what I'm seeing on apple's web site seems like it could replace my nano, and cell phone, but I also have a PDA so i'm curious to know how strong are the PIM software if any.
sharpycl at 2007-11-15 13:10:41 >
# 12 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Knowing Apple, the software will be excellent. How does it interface with a Windows box, that's another matter. :D

Anybody wanna bet Apple paid Cisco major $dough to use "iPhone"? Otherwise the thing would be $150 cheaper!
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:11:36 >
# 13 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
It's a pretty sweet device. As far as touch screen controls/interface design goes, it's everything I was hoping for and then some. But the phone means nothing to me personally. If they take out the phone functionality, remove the puny 8 gig flash storage and add a 100 gig hard disk in its place, I'd grab one in a heart beat.

I have a feeling we haven't seen the last of the coming iPod upgrades. They've come too far to take a step backward storage-wise. People who just want a high-capacity music/video player are still counting on large storage, and I doubt Apple is going to leave them in the cold.
Arkonnan at 2007-11-15 13:12:42 >
# 14 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Congratulations on another successful keynote speech. It goes without saying that youve outdone yourself. Once again, youve exceeded all expectations and laid the question of competition to rest.

While I must acknowledge that your new iPhone is incredibly innovative, I admit that I was hoping to something a bit more in line with your previous exploits. Specifically, I was looking for the fabled 6G iPod.

I realize that announcing an iPod with similar functionality minus the phone and internet capabilities would put somewhat of a damper on the fanfare of the day. However, it would also send another shot across Microsofts bow as their Zune hype bubble continues to deflate.

A widescreen is great for internet browsing, but I believe that it is best utilized to view movies. With your recent deal with Paramount, you have the perfect foundation to launch a new line of iPods. I envision an iPod that is scratch-resistant, usable without having to view the screen, and Bluetooth enabled. I dream of capacities of 60GB or more along with firewire connectivity. The accelerometer that you included in the iPhone could be used to detect a sudden freefall, shutting down the hard drive to prevent further damage upon impact.

So I have the following declaration for you, Steve Jobs: I have $500 set aside. In fact, it has been set aside for the past 4 months since my previous iPod suffered water damage and I heard rumors of a touchscreen update. The day you release this requested update, I give you my word that you will be at least $500 more wealthy. A man of your current affluence may not mark the significance of an additional $500. But take it as both a show of good faith, and an acknowledgement that behind me there is an army of consumers who are holding out for the same thing.

Regards
ChipT at 2007-11-15 13:13:48 >
# 15 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I have a feeling we haven't seen the last of the coming iPod upgrades.
Dunn worry, u should see more, but the wait is gonna be gut-wrentching for the some of u. :D

This device is really a PHONE FIRST/PDA/WebSurfer, then a video player (just 'cuz of the larger screen) second.

Steve Jobs has a history of making stuff that he dreams of (thinner! revolutionary! cool!), then a year later the more down-to-earth accountants (hey, we "gotta make money") convince him to make another model more to everybody's liking to be the "cash cow."
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:14:40 >
# 16 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Its some cool technology, but it'll be too tiny for websurfing, and too space-constrained for a video player (and really pretty space-constrained for a MP3 player). It looks awfully fragile for a cellphone, too.

Cellphone interfaces are pretty bad, but is it worth an extra $300-400 over today's top phones to have a pretty interface? Maybe if you use it a lot, I guess. That sort of implies business users...business users who are satisfied with using Yahoo for e-mail! :shake:

It really makes me wonder who they thought they were building this for.
bdb at 2007-11-15 13:15:44 >
# 17 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
After thinking a little more about it, they should have a Build-Your-Own type of thing like most companies do with laptops. I'm not sure what the premium charge that adds is, but if it's low enough, it would be the easiest way to make everyone happy. You could get only the components you want no matter what they were. If you wanted the internet functionality without the phone, and with a 100 Gig HD, I don't see why you shouldn't be able too. Really, if it runs OS X, even a chopped down and different version, it IS a computer and shouyld be sold as such.

edit: Additionally, you have to remember the price of the first gen iPod. It was 5 or 6 hundred bucks, had a 5 gig drive and was the size of a brick (A very tiny brick, but it was big). In a couple years the price will be down significantly, but in the time being the early adopters will be happy.
papayaninja at 2007-11-15 13:16:41 >
# 18 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I couldn't agree more with some of the post already here. Sorry Apple I love my 3G iPod and what a new one very bad but I am happy with my current cell phone plan and I don't want to switch to another cell phone company.

We also know that when you use any cell phone and make lots of calls the batteries die. But you can snap in an extra battery and off you go. Is this device going to have user replicable batteries or are we looking at a device where I have to send it back to Apple or service for a new cell phone battery?

For me I would like Apple to drop the phone from the device and add in a hard drive please. The average TV show download or rip off my TV is 350/600 Megs. Eight Gigs in a video player is just not enough for me. I know another company has announced a video player that is also eight Gigs and they say you can put 33 hours of video on it. While I am sure they wouldn’t lie, I just can’t imagine what the video quality must be like. It must be cell phone video quality and I am not interested in that.

I very much want to get a new wide screen 60+ gig video iPod. I hope they come out with it soon as I have to buy my forth replacement battery for my 3G iPod soon.

As for some of the 802.11b/g stuff could be fun to play with but music and videos is what I want at the core of the device.

My 0.02
jdawson at 2007-11-15 13:17:48 >
# 19 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
one of the things that seems to me would be quite a big problem, is the whole "putting the screen on your ear and expecting to see clearly through it." now this may sound gross to some, but everybody i've talked to has a hard time seeing their little razor screen after using it. as humans, we're pretty much filthy creatures (even right out of the shower). having that kind of skin/oil/gross all over the screen is going to present problems when trying to wipe it off (if it's going to be as scratch prone as any of the G5's are currently)... just a thought. i know... it's a gross thought, but still... put that in your pipe and smoke it. :)
Agg2001 at 2007-11-15 13:18:46 >
# 20 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
that thing looks freakin amazing, but I would like lower price, more memory, no touchscreen, and pretty much turn it back into the 5G ipod :D.

$500 is waaaayy too much for a 4 gigs of space, and I don't need the phone.
podliver at 2007-11-15 13:19:47 >
# 21 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Right. I think the iPhone is a wonder of technology...but...

8gb space? Well its ok now, not really enough, but when it gets to the UK in almost a year will it have got bigger with time? I have significantly more music than that, not even taking into account pics and video...

2mp Camera? Err, my sony currently as a 3.3mp camera and again, in a years time in the UK a 2mp camera will be horribly outdated.

Running OSX? Hmmm, I dont know this (so any response is appreciated) but can you load things onto it? Would be nice to edit documents on the move or at least view them. And witht the notes bit if you dont have a stylus I dont see an easy way of just jotting stuff down.

If this ships in the UK in a years time with a better camera and more space (nice but not a necessity) and OSX options then I am a given buyer. Until then I'll just wait for the reviews in america!!!
ajm at 2007-11-15 13:20:54 >
# 22 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Looks like I'll still be savin some more money for an 80gb iPod, 8GB is the major downfall that and the price (switch one or the other =P)
Phillyzero at 2007-11-15 13:21:50 >
# 23 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well, I think the other factor here as to why they took this approach (an all-in-one device) rather than a standalone iPod was to ensure a much bigger and stronger impact for the iPhone itself... In order to partner with Cingular from a position of strength, Apple had to ensure that they could bring something absolutely groundbreaking to the table.

If they had released this as just an upgraded iPod, much of the "wow" factor would be gone when the iPhone itself came out, since it would just be adding phone features to an existing iPod, and would therefore be much less exciting by comparison.

I'm sure there will be Cingular customers who are going to be all over this thing just for the iPod-based capabilities.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 13:22:50 >
# 24 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well, I think the other factor here as to why they took this approach (an all-in-one device) rather than a standalone iPod was to ensure a much bigger and stronger impact for the iPhone itself...

I have no doubt that this is exactly why they debuted only one iPod device. The impact would have been severely diminished had they debuted an entire lineup. But I also don't believe that Apple would abandon their high capacity market segment, especially if they ever plan on expanding their movie/media offerings. Let's face it, 8 gigs is paltry.

But Steve Jobs has said before that video just isn't there yet. I agree. I don't think we will see another high capacity media-oriented iPod until Apple gets more movie distribution deals under its belt. They won't release this thing unless they have product to go with it, just as I believe they would not have released the phone without a carrier to offer service(they could have, but for simplicity sake I doubt they would have).
Arkonnan at 2007-11-15 13:23:50 >
# 25 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I think it's fair to say that there will definitely be a higher-capacity version of this device, probably without the phone/wireless capabilties, and Apple now has at least six months before they need to worry about it. Even when it does debut, since the iPhone is the far more complex device, there will be far less R&D to worry about in debuting it.

As for partnering with a carrier, that's almost a necessity in the mobile phone business. Further, I don't know if Cingular is subsidizing this or not (as Apple's deal with Cingular is far from a standard manufacturer/carrier relationship), but if they are that would be necessary to keep the costs reasonable (this is priced in the same way as the early Palm Treo's and Blackberries were, and it's a much more sophisticated device).

Also, let's not forget that Apple has partnered with Cingular to also provide a better experience for things like the visual voicemail. This requires carrier-side integration to pull off successfully.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 13:24:54 >
# 26 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
This is not the next generation iPod. It is the first generation Apple phone. It's not meant to replace the iPod Video. It's meant to compete in the Phone/PDA market. So if you take that into consideration...It's a pretty good product. I'd bet if it were only $200 EVERYONE would buy it.
podster1 at 2007-11-15 13:25:55 >
# 27 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Wait, I haven't done that much research so don't flame me. Is this a touchscreen? :(
Nader172 at 2007-11-15 13:27:00 >
# 28 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Wait, I haven't done that much research so don't flame me. Is this a touchscreen? :(

Yessir, it is.
Arkonnan at 2007-11-15 13:27:57 >
# 29 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Wait, I haven't done that much research so don't flame me. Is this a touchscreen? :(

Yessir, it is.

Unfortunately I knew something like this would happen. I guess I feared the worst... :o
Nader172 at 2007-11-15 13:29:03 >
# 30 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Unfortunately I knew something like this would happen. I guess I feared the worst... :o
Oh comeon, have a little faith. Am not a fan of touchscreen either but Apple would not have released such thing wo a wizzybang super high-tech highly scratch resistant screen (I can be proven wrong of course!) Will see, when the hands-on reviews start to come in.

People, this is NOT AN iPod, it's a PHONE with iPod features. So don't have a cow and can stop complaining about the paltry 8 gig now.

Removable battery - good point.
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:29:55 >
# 31 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
i saw it and immediatly i loved it. it was for mne. But then they announced it was for cingular.. ok now i will have to pay for my own plan... not so bad.. lets see cingular's lowest priced one person plan... $40 per month ouch... ok lets see the phones price.. problably $300 like the iPods... ok holy ####ing #### $600? Apple, did you get your price mixed with sony PS3?

lets see.

my current t-mobile(family plan 5th add 9.99 a month) and Samsung T629 slider(Xmas Present) - to me, free bc my dad pays for family plan

Switch to cingular and iPhone:

iPhone - $600
2 years of cingular service at lowest rates: $960

If you switch from a different service provider, the iPhone will cost you $1,500 dollars and you will have to keep it for 2 years
SuperNYK992 at 2007-11-15 13:31:06 >
# 32 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
this is frickin' awesome. however i just got my blackberry pearl.

as for the iphone i fell in love with it's looks and features the second i read about it. it's so for me and i want it badly now. however my family's contract is with t mobile and i'm wondering when they'll also provide the phone with t mobile. perhaps a month or two after it releases with cingular. around here cingular has the worse signal.

as for the phone being bought without a contract. probably more than 800 dollars just for the 4gb alone.

this may take some time saving up the money. ridiculous though! 800 dollars for a phone. that money could buy a whole new computer.

.......overall love it but hate the price tag. i must have it though.
ipodphoto30 at 2007-11-15 13:31:58 >
# 33 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
alot of people want the iPhone, but the PRICE is WAY too high.
I guess i'll have to stick with the krzr, if i'll be able to get it...

Off-topic, neone got and suggestions for phones at or below 100? (krzr is 100 here). From sprint and verizon?
Krn iPod at 2007-11-15 13:32:59 >
# 34 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I like it. 8 gigs is enough for me since I would always have my 30 gig video on me at all times and since it has internet, a qwerty keyboard, texting, and all that it just suddenly became more attractive than the sidekick plus its an apple product. Quality engineering.
skateboarderx24 at 2007-11-15 13:34:03 >
# 35 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Holy moly 500 dollars + subscripton. I just want the VideoIpod. Hopefully Apple whores out their multi touch screen to the normal ipod. And maybe we will see the true VideoIpod this coming fall (with lots of storage-space).
roger767 at 2007-11-15 13:35:05 >
# 36 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
People are going to complain like hell abou the touch pad I bet and the proximity sensor. I see it coming already.
viper69 at 2007-11-15 13:36:07 >
# 37 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
So... I guess the 6G is pretty much answered now? Funny that it will cost an arm and a leg though. lol

Anyway, yeah... so I watched the news since I'm out of town and happen to catch the "hype" the news built up. Of course they waited til the end of the news so you'd toon in the whole time. :rolleyes:

Frankly, I'm not impressed... especially after hearing the price and that it only has 8gb. We haven't even gotten into the service plan either. No, thanks... My Sprint SLVR and 1yr old 5G is just fine thanks.

Oh yeah, I like how Jobs says "your life in your pocket" or the ultimate device for your life. Ha ha... reminded me of that SNL spoof from awhile ago. Lots of bull.
VipFREAK at 2007-11-15 13:37:10 >
# 38 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
i saw it and immediatly i loved it. it was for mne. But then they announced it was for cingular.. ok now i will have to pay for my own plan... not so bad.. lets see cingular's lowest priced one person plan... $40 per month ouch... ok lets see the phones price.. problably $300 like the iPods... ok holy ####ing #### $600? Apple, did you get your price mixed with sony PS3?

lets see.

my current t-mobile(family plan 5th add 9.99 a month) and Samsung T629 slider(Xmas Present) - to me, free bc my dad pays for family plan

Switch to cingular and iPhone:

iPhone - $600
2 years of cingular service at lowest rates: $960

If you switch from a different service provider, the iPhone will cost you $1,500 dollars and you will have to keep it for 2 years

No... you see alot of us adults actually pay for our own cell phone service. Since I am ALREADY paying $100 for my plan (I have lots of phones and family members on it) then going to cingular will only incur an additional cost of $600. So no, the iPhone doesn't cost me $1500. It costs me $600. I'll be paying for my cellphone service REGARDLESS if I get an iPhone or not.
JMG at 2007-11-15 13:38:13 >
# 39 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I want Skype and iChat AV on this baby and until that happens I doubt I'll be getting one. I think its really promising though and if there are improvements on the first gen or a 2.0 version I might get one. I'm in two minds whether or not to pick up one when I go to UK at the end of the year.

At the VERY least, it'll stop those iPhone rumors that come around every 2 weeks.
Kristiano at 2007-11-15 13:39:12 >
# 40 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
*sigh* Im dissapointed with Apple. People who are gonna buy the iPhone are:

-An Apple whore
-Obsessive gadget freaks
-Spoilt rich kids who have parents with not a grain of sense.

Pull it together Jobs and pull out another frikin iPod.

p.s. the price range for this is riddiculous. I would rather buy a PS3 for the same cash.
xboxman at 2007-11-15 13:40:08 >
# 41 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
As has already been pointed out: this is not the video iPod, but it may give us a good idea of what the new video iPod might look like. Clearly with only 8gb, this is not your portable video device, but it does seem to do everything else. Price tag is high, but not too high when you look at other devices with the same functions, and it seems to integrate those functions better than any of the competing device, but then that's based on one demo, and until the users get their hands on this, we won't really know. But it looks beautiful to me. The high price tag of the item might not be too bad if it's not coupled with a high service plan from Cingular. The phone aspect looks great, but doesn't begin to justify the price. What makes it look like it'll be worthwhile to me is the internet/e-mail/PDA functions. If it does that as well as the demo showed us, and if the price for using those features isn't too hefty, then this could be very handy indeed. I've wanted to receive e-mail on my phone for a long time, and I know it's possible, but it never seemed easy enough. Apple, as usual, makes it look easy.
Here's what I want: I want to stop in at my local WiFi enabled coffee shop to get a coffee, and while I'm waiting in line, have my phone grab my latest e-mail and send off my latest responses, and log my chat client on in case someone wants to send a quick IM. I want my calendar and my contacts, and I want to be able to edit them on the phone and have it update my iMac at the next sync. And if it can serve up a couple of songs or the episode of the last TV show I missed, so much the better. If it can download them from my home computer (or directly from iTunes) while I sit at the office, so I can watch them on the bus ride home, I may cry. Based on my experience with Apple and OSX, this device has chance at doing all that.
The iPod is one of the best at storing and serving audio and, to a lesser extent, video. The iPhone serves entirely different, communication/organization-based functions. Any added iPod functions are just icing on the cake. If you're used to carrying a nano/shuffle and a phone, this could replace both, but otherwise it will probably only supplement your full-sized iPod, but if it works well it could still be an extremely handy item.
Mr. E. at 2007-11-15 13:41:15 >
# 42 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Oh comeon, have a little faith. Am not a fan of touchscreen either but Apple would not have released such thing wo a wizzybang super high-tech highly scratch resistant screen (I can be proven wrong of course!) Will see, when the hands-on reviews start to come in.

People, this is NOT AN iPod, it's a PHONE with iPod features. So don't have a cow and can stop complaining about the paltry 8 gig now.

Removable battery - good point.

What's that about Apple and scratches? Erm, have you even owned an iPod at all?:confused:
xboxman at 2007-11-15 13:42:09 >
# 43 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
As for the price range, yes of course it would be ridiculously high for an iPod, but I have paid in the $500 range for just about every PDA/smartphone device I have ever owned when it first came out. This device is an entry in the Blackberry/Treo space, not the iPod space.

For me, this device would replace my Blackberry and maybe my cell phone (depending on whether or not it includes things like voice-activated dialing), and would probably mean that I wouldn't bother bringing my iPod with me on daily commutes or other routine travel around the city.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 13:43:13 >
# 44 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
What's that about Apple and scratches? Erm, have you even owned an iPod at all?:confused:
Oh no, a full six month b4 it's available, and the very FIRST SCRATCH post! :D

I'm gonna to ignore the owned comment, but suffice to say, for every complaint about scratches, another iPodder is perfect happy with his, so who knows.
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:44:18 >
# 45 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
The iPhone price is with a 2 year contract too, I can't imagine the RETAIL price on the sucker.

Internet? I bet its slow as hell, at least it is with blackberry devices..and I have a computer for that and most current phones support it.

Videos? My 5G does that.
Songs? My nano/5G does that.
8GB capacity? Pathetic, my iPod has 10 times that capacity.
Price? I could buy two 80GB iPods for the price of one 8GB iPhone.

As far as I can tell the only thing this device really revolutionalizes is a touch screen..and that really doesn't justify the price tag.

The iPhone is really stuck in the middle, it has a bunch of business applications that kids won't touch and at the same time it has video/music functions that businesses/older generation won't touch, I highly doubt any serious company is going to buy these phones for their employees. So who is it marketed for?
paranoidxe at 2007-11-15 13:45:18 >
# 46 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I think the thing looks amazing without a doubt and if my cell was a big part in everyday life I would buy it. Unfortunately I'm only 14 and my friends either have no credit or don't have their phones on them so it doesn't interest me at the moment. As for other features, well I own a 7 megapixel camera, mac os x, and an iPod and none of these things are going to be made redundant by the iPhone.

As for those who are wondering about new iPods all I can say is judging by the way Apple has worked in the past I'm predicting there will be some revision to the iPod line in May/June time. This means prices will be lowered and lower spec models may be made redundant. I don't think there will be any new iPods as new iPods are usually announced either in the fourth quarter of the year or at MacWorld. I'm pretty sure the earliest new iPods will emerge is August at the Apple conference. In my opinion hanging around for new iPods right now is pointless and you will lose out on months of enjoyment.
Eddie 92 at 2007-11-15 13:46:13 >
# 47 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
the thing is very cool i must say. but if were going to mix a phone and an ipod in one. why leave the capacity at 8gb. thats no good unless you're a current nano user.. for a 30gb or above ipod user it makes no sense to upgrade.
and also do we know if it plays .avi ! i'm pretty sure it does not.
ali at 2007-11-15 13:47:21 >
# 48 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I am amazed at how many negative comments there are about the iPhone. I watched the keynote speech and I was very impressed by Apples latest gadget. The UI is just incredible.

I have used PocketPCs for years and have been using a PPC Phone (HTC Wizard) for over a year. As pointed out in earlier posts, most of the features offered by the iPhone are already available in PPC phones like my wizard. For example, I have push email, mp3 player, contacts/calendar/PIM, touch screen, Bluetooth, wifi, picture view and an internet browser. While many of the apps required to take advantage of these features are built into the OS (WM5), most PPC owners end up using 3rd party apps to make these options better and easier to use. The overall result is a device with every feature having a different look and feel. Because there is very little consistency, the phone is not very intuitive or easy to use. (I wont even get into the headaches caused by problems syncing, with firmware or with the device requiring regular resets.)

All of the core features in the iPhone take advantage of the same UI style. It is therefore easy to use as well as very intuitive. With the addition of widgets, there is even a method for adding additional applications like GPS navigation software (using a Bluetooth GPS receiver) to be added by those who need them. Even though most of the features are already available on other phones, they feel like new features because their implementation is so well done.

The biggest two complaints I see are the amount of flash memory and the price. I agree that 8Gb is not a lot if video is important to you. I dont see myself ever watching videos on a small screen (I have the ability with my current phone and have only watched one movie on it). For me that leaves only music to worry about. Since I recently switched from a 40Gb iPod to an 8Gb Nano, I am already comfortable with the space available. BTW, I find that not having my entire music collection (30+Gb) with me at all times is actually a good thing. Once a week or so, I pick out about 100 albums to put on my nano. This ends up making me listen to a bigger variety of my collection and with over 100 albums to choose from at any given time, I always have something to listen to that fits my mood of the moment.

The price is the other major complaint. If you compare the iPhone to high end smart phones that have a similar feature set, you will find that the price is appropriate. This is especially true when you consider that it has an 8Gb iPod built in to it. And as we all know, with time the price will come down.

I am not saying that the iPhone is the perfect phone, but IMHO it is a giant leap in the right direction. I can not wait to see the 2nd generation iPhone.
wot_fan at 2007-11-15 13:48:23 >
# 49 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I agree I currently own a PPC device and while I think the iphone is GREAT I would not switch at this time. I can run every emulator on my phone and play DOOM,, QUAKE, WOLF. The iphone cant do any of this and based on Apple's past I dont see them opening it up for coders to port games and new apps to. My current Pocket PC also have pocket artist which allows me to draw right on the screen and while not as elegant as the iphone I can watch movies and listen to music also. HOWEVER this is just a start.. The second or third gen iphones might be better and IF they allow the code to the public then all bets are off as we will just see a ton of apps and games.
NYIllustrator at 2007-11-15 13:49:24 >
# 50 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I don't see why Apple would not allow third party applications. Every hardware vendor wish the world would write programs for it, just makes it more popular.
bobb-mini at 2007-11-15 13:50:16 >
# 51 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I don't see why Apple would not allow third party applications. Every hardware vendor wish the world would write programs for it, just makes it more popular.

I think the other poster was referring to the fact that the iPod was never opened up to developers by Apple.

I think the iPhone will be different though and we will see a developers package for people to add their own widgets or apps to it, but that surely is down the road. For all we know about the iPhone, major speculation still exists until a hard model is in someone's hands.
studogvetmed at 2007-11-15 13:51:17 >
# 52 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Disappointing, to say the least. I have been waiting for the upgrade to my 5th gen 30 gig and thats what they come up with? Lame.
why would i go from 30g to 8g. its a widescreen ipod for videos, too bad u can't keep very many on it. For me this is the worst part.
I have a phone with browser capabilities on it, why would i need an ipod with that. I definetly don't use the browser on my phone. Have u seen the bill after a month of data service(ouch). Tried it on my pocket pc.
It's only exclusive to Cingular. I am in Canada, so much for that idea.
I already have a contract on my present phone.
The price is about 300 dollars too much.
It does have a kool graphic display.
Where are the normal wide screen video ipods, with the storage capacity of 80+ Gigs?
The camera is a good idea, but 2.0 Mega pixel is extremely low.
I will not spend my money on it. When the standard video only version comes out I will be all over it. I would even pay $500 for a 80G version
spaceman1701 at 2007-11-15 13:52:26 >
# 53 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I am definatly geting one when it comes out. For me, i have a 30 gig ipod. I like it, but the thing is that i only have 2.5 gigs of music on it, and i dont find it realistic to watch movies on it. This phone looks amazing. It makes my v3i ridicoulous. Plus, i am tired of the RAZR design. With all the funcionality with the wifi and everything, it is perfect. everywhere i go has wifi, my school, my house, starbucks. Not to mention that the phone is Cingular, which is my provider, and i am due for a upgrade in June. Cingular is the only provider in my area that works. Just my 2 cents, i think it is great for some people, not so great for others with amazing music collections. It will work perfect for nano owners, but no so great for 80/60 gig ipod owners. Not to mention i am glad that they have told me about it now, so i can save up 25 bucks a week to fund it. THX Apple

Regards
joeylang at 2007-11-15 13:53:22 >
# 54 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Disappointing, to say the least. I have been waiting for the upgrade to my 5th gen 30 gig and thats what they come up with? Lame.
why would i go from 30g to 8g. its a widescreen ipod for videos, too bad u can't keep very many on it. For me this is the worst part.
I have a phone with browser capabilities on it, why would i need an ipod with that. I definetly don't use the browser on my phone. Have u seen the bill after a month of data service(ouch). Tried it on my pocket pc.
It's only exclusive to Cingular. I am in Canada, so much for that idea.
I already have a contract on my present phone.
The price is about 300 dollars too much.
It does have a kool graphic display.
Where are the normal wide screen video ipods, with the storage capacity of 80+ Gigs?
The camera is a good idea, but 2.0 Mega pixel is extremely low.
I will not spend my money on it. When the standard video only version comes out I will be all over it. I would even pay $500 for a 80G version
I think it's supposed to replace future buyers of smartphones. If you had a choice between a nokia N95 and an iPhone, which one are you gonna pick? Anyways, storage space will come up over the years, just like the first iPod, started out at 10GB now we have thin 80GB iPods.
Because if you think about it, 8GB is a lot to cram into 11.6mm which also holds the battery, screen and other components. San Disk came out with this new storage thingie for laptop computers which is pretty thin and holds a lot of storage, the technology isn't that far away.
I think the the thing about the iPhone that blows me away is the multi-touch screen and accelerometer. Bloody Amazing. Check it out if you haven't already at http://www.apple.com/iphone/ipod/ You have to see to believe.
TigersabreZ at 2007-11-15 13:54:25 >
# 55 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I think it's supposed to replace future buyers of smartphones. If you had a choice between a nokia N95 and an iPhone, which one are you gonna pick? Anyways, storage space will come up over the years, just like the first iPod, started out at 10GB now we have thin 80GB iPods.
Because if you think about it, 8GB is a lot to cram into 11.6mm which also holds the battery, screen and other components. San Disk came out with this new storage thingie for laptop computers which is pretty thin and holds a lot of storage, the technology isn't that far away.
I think the the thing about the iPhone that blows me away is the multi-touch screen and accelerometer. Bloody Amazing. Check it out if you haven't already at http://www.apple.com/iphone/ipod/ You have to see to believe.

I'd pick the N95, Its still has GPS and a 5MPX carl zeiss lens.
Electric mofo at 2007-11-15 13:55:21 >
# 56 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Following are two must-read articles:

http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Just_One_More_Thing_Its_the_i7650.php

http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Breaking_Through.php
Alien at 2007-11-15 13:56:24 >
# 57 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Links don't work Alien.
jdawson at 2007-11-15 13:57:25 >
# 58 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I think it's supposed to replace future buyers of smartphones. If you had a choice between a nokia N95 and an iPhone, which one are you gonna pick? Anyways, storage space will come up over the years, just like the first iPod, started out at 10GB now we have thin 80GB iPods.
Because if you think about it, 8GB is a lot to cram into 11.6mm which also holds the battery, screen and other components. San Disk came out with this new storage thingie for laptop computers which is pretty thin and holds a lot of storage, the technology isn't that far away.
I think the the thing about the iPhone that blows me away is the multi-touch screen and accelerometer. Bloody Amazing. Check it out if you haven't already at http://www.apple.com/iphone/ipod/ You have to see to believe.
Don't get me wrong. the technology behind the Ipod part is outstanding, it is the rest of it that is disappointing. I have a seimens pocket pc, which is a smart phone, but i still prefer to keep my phone as my phone and my data machine seperate. I have a motorola V551M, a basic phone and that all i need. It texts and I put it to my ear, what else do i need?
If the new widescreen ipod was just a mp3 and video player, I would be all over it and I would pay that kind of money(provided the storage was larger). I have been waiting and I expected the new widescreen ipod to be minimum 80G with a price tag of 500+. I was ready to pay it. Told the wife I would be getting one as soon as it hit the stores. Now I am uninterested.
spaceman1701 at 2007-11-15 13:58:30 >
# 59 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Now i cannot imagine paying 500+ dollars for a ipod with no other functionality to it. IN reality, this phone is worth it in all repects. I figure that you buy an ipod nano, which would cost a cool 250. Then you buy a phone with even semi-comparable funtions sans wifi, and your gona pay 200= for it. Then you could go out and buy an internet communicater, IE the Nokia n800, and you are gonna pay 400 dollars more. So to me, that is easily about 850 dollars for 3 seperate devices hat can be nudled in one device for a great price. I am seriusly gonna sell my ipod and my phone and get this thing ASAP. It has a amzing UI that NO other phone comes close too, and you cant put a price on that. Apple has seriusly revolutionized the cell phone era.
joeylang at 2007-11-15 13:59:34 >
# 60 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Apple has stated it will be a locked unit and no third party software development will be allowed. Of course Im sure there will be things you can download from Cingular and pay for just like any other phone, but we wont see any of those games, emulators or apps that all those developers made for the Pocket PC.

I think the iphone is cool and might get better in the future and the UI is WAAAAY better than Pocket PC, but the bottom line is my Pocket PC Phone can still do everything the iphone can plus more, even if it doesnt do it as elegantly. I mean my Pocket PC has a program that is just as good as Photoshop on it (Pocket Artist), when I start seeing some killer apps and games on the iphone (if they ever release a SDK) then I will get it.
NYIllustrator at 2007-11-15 14:00:35 >
# 61 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Links don't work Alien.

They're working for me. Don't copy and paste the links but click on them.
Alien at 2007-11-15 14:01:34 >
# 62 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
What phone carriers will the iPhone be able to work with?
afalconsvick at 2007-11-15 14:02:29 >
# 63 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Carier. Cingular.
TheJosher at 2007-11-15 14:03:33 >
# 64 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Actually, the iPhone will only initially be released for Cingular, and will almost certainly be a "locked" phone to work with only that carrier. However, this doesn't mean it won't be capable of being released for other carriers.

Any GSM carrier can technically support the iPhone, subject to Apple providing the iPhone to those carriers. In the U.S., I believe the options are Cingular and T-Mobile, although Apple has signed a "multi-year exclusive" deal with Cingular, so I don't expect that T-Mobile will have them for some time.

In other countries, that's more of a mixed bag, as we don't know who Apple is going to sign with. In Canada, there is only one major GSM provider, and that is Rogers (Fido also provides GSM, but since they're owned by Rogers now, it's really just a different brand).
jhollington at 2007-11-15 14:04:33 >
# 65 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
The iPhone.
Something to expensive and unusable to me. 600 dollars, plus the monthly phone bill. I don't think so. It is really neat and stuff, because I want a cell phone, but I can live without it because I wouldn't use that part a lot. The 8GB really kills it. I have a 30GB 5.5G. I am filling that thing up like crazy. 8GB would be gone. The touchscreen part? Couldn't the screen scratch/crack/fingerprint easily? The new iPhone is a cool thing though for Apple. It may be a perfect thing for you, but for me, I am sticking with my 5.5G 30GB Black iPod Video.
.iLou. at 2007-11-15 14:05:38 >
# 66 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
i LOVE the multi functionality of my iPod, but I just need a phone to make telephone calls, that's it

I don't need a crappy camera, a stupid tip calculator, or crappy eight bit games

now for the iPhone, it looks like a very nice piece of technology with many advancements, but like I said, I only need to make telephone calls on a phone
mrdantownsend at 2007-11-15 14:06:35 >
# 67 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Man, i cant believe this whole," all i need is to make calls" bit. I dont personally know one person that wants a phone to simply make calls. I think cell phone were meant to do many things, and i personally use my phone for a lot of stuff. If i forget my calculater in math, then i can pull out my phone and do something right quick, or if i am bored on a bus ride, then i can pull out my cell phone and listen to music or play games. There are many uses for cell phones, but the iPhone just implements many of these uses way better than most phone, espacially in the internet/mp3 player catogories.
joeylang at 2007-11-15 14:07:36 >
# 68 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Actually, I know plenty of people who only want a phone to make calls. Some people simply don't care about mp3 players, music, etc. Personally, I love technology and the smartphones and all that jazz, but the fact is, there's a fair margin of people who simply don't care about all that stuff. They want a phone with a clear signal, and that's all they need.

The thing I'm curious to see is what content gets added to the iTunes music store after the release of the iPhone. Rigntones, possible third-party apps and widgets... I think it'll be interesting to see.

I definetely want this phone. I have an iPod now, but due to the fact that I rarely listen to the majority of my music collection (I have tons of CDs, but other than the rare quality CD that isn't filled with... filler, only a few songs from each CD get listened to), 8 gigs is ample storage for a fair amount of music and a handful of vids. However, I wonder how much stuff like Visual Voicemail and internet access on the phone will cost. I'd imagine that when in range of a wireless connection, surely it would be free? Especially if the iPhone is as good as it says it is with automatically switching between signals.
Germansuplex at 2007-11-15 14:08:41 >
# 69 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well i agree with you, and i too am curious to see what is going to b added to the itunes store. I hadnt though of this until now, but what if they had like songs that came with ringtones or sumtin, that would be really cool. I definatly am getting this phone, and probably selling my ipod. Apple said 3rd party apps would nto be supported, but it would be cool if they had widgets on the itunes store as well.
joeylang at 2007-11-15 14:09:37 >
# 70 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
any word if you can buy the phone without contract?

600 with contract is too much. there are many other phones for so much cheaper. slvr? its a bit of a sacrafice, but the price difference..

thinking 900-1000 for the iphone without cingular?

could buy a laptop with that. maybe 80 gb. plenty of room for music and videos there. and get internet phone. its free.
juiceranch at 2007-11-15 14:10:41 >
# 71 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Would be kinda funny to see you holding up a laptop to your head though.
VipFREAK at 2007-11-15 14:11:45 >
# 72 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
WEll the problem is that it wont be sold outside of cingular. So basicaly you pay 5/600 dollars or nothing, because they have a multi-year exclusivity contract with apple that states that it is to not be sold at any other carrier than cingular. But i do agree, you could get a laptop with that money, but i guess it all depends on what you want. SOme people are really into cell phones nd mp3 players(me), so i would rather get this than a mediocre laptop for 600 bucks.
joeylang at 2007-11-15 14:12:37 >
# 73 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
the iphone looks freakin sweet id sell my toes to get it and possibly my fingers lol
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
oh one more thing yay widgets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the god of the at 2007-11-15 14:13:42 >
# 74 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
The iPhone price is with a 2 year contract too, I can't imagine the RETAIL price on the sucker.

Internet? I bet its slow as hell, at least it is with blackberry devices..and I have a computer for that and most current phones support it.

Videos? My 5G does that.
Songs? My nano/5G does that.
8GB capacity? Pathetic, my iPod has 10 times that capacity.
Price? I could buy two 80GB iPods for the price of one 8GB iPhone.

As far as I can tell the only thing this device really revolutionalizes is a touch screen..and that really doesn't justify the price tag.

The iPhone is really stuck in the middle, it has a bunch of business applications that kids won't touch and at the same time it has video/music functions that businesses/older generation won't touch, I highly doubt any serious company is going to buy these phones for their employees. So who is it marketed for?

one simple answer to your question me lol ;)
the god of the at 2007-11-15 14:14:46 >
# 75 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well, I have a Blackberry and I really like it. I use the email functions, the calendaring, the contact management and so forth. BUT, if I had to give it up, I wouldn't miss that stuff all that much. Sure, it's nice to have that information with me on the road but I also have it on my laptop, on my Palm and on my desktop. Games and chat don't ring my bell.

So, I could live without everything that supposedly makes the iPhone unique. And even if I couldn't, there are dozens of great smart phones on the market that do just as much or more than iPhone for far less than half the price.

That, I think, is the primary difference between iPhone and iPod for me. I can live without all the gizmos on a smart phone. I can NOT live without iPod. The fact of the matter is that iPhone is not an iPod. It's just a fancy phone with iTunes and a little dribble of storage space. That's not enough to attract me to purchase it. And truth be told, if iPod ends up morphing into iPhone lite, I'm going to be very disappointed. I don't want my media player to be a Newton or a Palm or whatever. I want it to be a media player.

Now, I'm not going to sit here and suggest that I'm the stereotypical iPhone target but judging by all the comments here and elsewhere, I believe that iPhone is going to be a MUCH harder sell than Apple seems to think it is. iPod has a vastly broader appeal than iPhone will ever have. When iPod came along, the MP3 market sucked. There was nothing even remotely similar in terms of raw usability and sexy design on the market. iPhone faces a vastly different playing field. The competition amongst smart phone makers is fierce and there are already a ton of sexy alternatives out there. With the advent of iPhone, these other manufacturers are going to amp up their offerings in very short order. iPhone has essentially no chance of remaining a best-of-class product for any significant amount of time.

And further, there's a lot of legitimacy to the opinions of those who say that they "just want a phone." Most devices that are "just phones" already have contact management, calendaring, games, chat and so forth. Not just smart phones, but ALL phones. You don't have to pay one red cent to get a phone that makes crystal clear calls, has excellent call tracking, integrates with iCal and Address book and so forth. I'm of the opinion that unless and until there's a true convergence of devices, people are going to continue to buy MP3 players AND phones as separate devices. iPhone isn't going to change that.

Bottom line: I'm not going to buy an iPhone and personally, I think its future is very uncertain. Apple is not infallable. They can just as easily stumble as succeed. The comments I've been reading suggest that it's up in the air at this point. We'll just have to wait and see how many of these things Apple actually sells. Don't believe the hype, people. Until it's on the market and people are buying them, it's all speculation. Me? I'll stick with my Blackberry and my 5.5g iPod.
Surf Monkey at 2007-11-15 14:15:44 >
# 76 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Apple is aiming for 1% of the market share worldwide. The phone also comes with a 50% markup... I highly doubt they stumble.

You also mention you have a palm and smartphone... sounds to me like an iPhone might cost just as much as both those items and perform their functions. The music option would be nice for listening to whats currently my most played. Not for traveling or the car but day to day when I have a half hour of downtime.
SenorCorwin at 2007-11-15 14:16:50 >
# 77 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Apple is aiming for 1% of the market share worldwide. The phone also comes with a 50% markup... I highly doubt they stumble.

Apple isn't going to be rolling this out world wide, at least not at first. Look how long it took to get iPod and iTunes rolled out across the globe. You still can't get iTunes in many countries.

You also mention you have a palm and smartphone... sounds to me like an iPhone might cost just as much as both those items and perform their functions.

You're missing the point. First of all, the smart phone I have didn't cost me a dime because such phones are readily available with a service contract at steeply discounted rates. You can go to any one of the major carriers right now and get a servicable smart phone for free or next to free. As far as my Palm goes, I already own that (it cost $299) and I have no need to upgrade it any time soon. So the reality is that I paid far less for the setup I have now and iPhone offers no compelling reason to spend a bunch more money to get the same funtions in a sexier case.

The music option would be nice for listening to whats currently my most played. Not for traveling or the car but day to day when I have a half hour of downtime.

Sure, but you can get that function for a lot less money in either a phone or a Nano or any number of other MP3 players. Again, the point isn't that the iPhone doesn't have nice features. It does. But it isn't enough of an advance in the technology to make it a "must buy" device in the same way that iPod was when it came along.
Surf Monkey at 2007-11-15 14:17:46 >
# 78 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Ill answer in order...

1. In a years time he would like 1% worldwide... again totally achievable.

2. What point? Comparable phones run $199.99 and your Palm is $299 along with your iPod you must have a batman utility belt look going on or very full pockets.

199.99
299.00
149.00

Grand total of 648.00 The price is not ridiculous.

3. Condensing all the above products into one would make it nice and its music/video capability makes it incomparable to any phone on the market. Size and functionality.
SenorCorwin at 2007-11-15 14:18:51 >
# 79 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Ill answer in order...

1. In a years time he would like 1% worldwide... again totally achievable.

2. What point? Comparable phones run $199.99 and your Palm is $299 along with your iPod you must have a batman utility belt look going on or very full pockets.

199.99
299.00
149.00

Grand total of 648.00 The price is not ridiculous.

3. Condensing all the above products into one would make it nice and its music/video capability makes it incomparable to any phone on the market. Size and functionality.
i completely agree but if you have an ipod and a smart phone already i would suggest you stick with that if you have one or the other than MABY you could buy i guess it depends on if either on your smart phone or ipod need an upgrade
the god of the at 2007-11-15 14:19:51 >
# 80 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I can think a number of reasons not to like this phone.
1. Push email is limited to yahoo.
2. Battery life. While I am taveling cross country I do not want to worry about listening to music while knowing that I will several calls to reply to when I land.
3. No third party applications.
4. Very pricy.
5. Syncing is limited to itunes. Not good for email, calander, and contact info if you are an outlook user.

Having said that the UI looks spectacular, and the integration of all the functionality should be seamless.
natsfan at 2007-11-15 14:20:49 >
# 81 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I tend to agree, and I'm not convinced that it's going to be a viable business-class device for these reasons.

For push e-mail, I'm seriously hoping that Apple is working on something to provide Blackberry or ActiveSync like functionality for the iPhone, otherwise it really will be relegated to a device for self-employed professionals and prosumers. No mid to large-sized business with any decent IT infrastructure is going to allow your business e-mail to be accessed from this device for security and interoperability reasons.

The battery life wouldn't be too bad for only listening to music, but trying to watch videos on a cross-country flight would almost guarantee that the phone would be dead by the time you landed.

The syncing being limited to iTunes isn't a huge issue for somebody who is comfortable syncing it to a desktop rather than wirelessly. You won't get e-mail, but Outlook 2003 will be supported (through iTunes) for Calendar and Contact functionality, in much the same way that it's supported with the iPod now, except that I expect it will be a two-way sync.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 14:21:46 >
# 82 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
All that capability and potential, and not enough space to do anything with it. 4G, 8G? And how much space will the OS take up? I don't understand. It's like they built a Lamborghini with a 6 ounce gas tank.
yah there may not be much space at all but just wait a little and they will, oh and the os x will take up 500 mb of space leaving you 3.5 gb or 7.5 gb of space for music, video and photos
monkeysrock0622 at 2007-11-15 14:22:50 >
# 83 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
yah there may not be much space at all but just wait a little and they will, oh and the os x will take up 500 mb of space leaving you 3.5 gb or 7.5 gb of space for music, video and photos

You don't know how much space the OS will take. That's pure speculation until the unit ships.
Surf Monkey at 2007-11-15 14:23:56 >
# 84 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I agree with jhollington in that it probably won't be what the tech-saavy full-on business rep is looking for, but there are a large number of people looking for something more useful than a sidekick or regular text-messaging based phone who buy palms and blackberrys simply because they need some of the features on them, not necessarily all. I myself fit into this mold. I would like to be able to browse the web on the go, check email, store some addresses and do some other things, but most "regular" cell-phones, of which some are able to techincally do, aren't ideal for doing those things, but I really don't need a blackberry. With the iPhone, I think it's a nice middleground. Plus, I don't think Apple is pushing this toward the ultra-busy business exec either, I think it's aiming for the middle ground.

Should Apple decide to tackle the busier crowd, it seems that the iPhone (or future versions of it) have the power to update themselves with more features and become more attractive to the blackberry crowd.
Germansuplex at 2007-11-15 14:24:58 >
# 85 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
hh
iPhone is having trouble coming to europe

Jobs. doenst want to sell simlock free iPhones to to EU market.
He's afraid that a lot of simlock free iPhones will merge to the US market and he'll lose a lot of money on it.

Well he is already, no service provider in europe wants to go with the demands of Jobs.
They find his propositions very arogant. Jobs wants to sell the iPhone with a provider but since the iPhone is EDGE and we are all UMTS allready in Europe, the trouble begins.

Also he'll probably won't sell a dime of iPhones in Europe if he only sells it with a provider contract.

I don't know how he ever wants to get into the EU market but that way he'll never sell a damn thing. All phones and devices are sold seperatly without a provider contract.

Seems that Jobs is gonna have to bow for the EU or see a big cut in his bills this year.
Looks like Jobs isn't that good a sales man, he's strategies are lacking big time.
EU isn't US, it's a tuff market out here :).

All phone companies are laughing great in Europa now, one reason more to buy a phone and not an iPhone.

Your losing lot of millions of , trust me that's even more $ Jobs.
Don't have to talk about all the big fans.

Apple is no better than M$ in the end.
Other products, same policy. Except, M$ sales his devices in EU same as the other.

Bow Jobs or you'll break your neck on this market.
darupz at 2007-11-15 14:25:53 >
# 86 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Ok I heard on the radio today Steve Jobs thinks he is going to sell over 10 million of these phones in the next 18 months? I don't think so!

Think about it:

Take for example the Nokia N95 phone:

- Symbian S60 OS
- 3.5 G compliant meaning Internet at DSL speeds
- built in GPS receiver
- support for microSDHC cards (4 GB is out) (8 GB is right around the corner)
- 5 mp camera with carl zeis lens
- AV cables for hookup to your TV
- Various mapping software for navigation (tomtom, route66, ...)
- A2DP profile support
- WIFI G
- Bluetooth support

Now this phone brand new goes for about 600-750 brand new on Ebay and it is unlocked for any GSM network. You can install any software you like.

Ok IPhone

- ONLY Edge support (that is 56Kbps modem support)
- can't add more memory
- can't install software
- no gps
- can't add external gps
- no navigation software

The one thing I have been waitng for and been praying for it to get big is 3.5 G networks. Why you ask? Think about it:

- Internet radio while i am driving
- You Tube while I am on transit
- live traffic reports while using tomtom
- best of all - I WOULD BE ABLE TO YOU SKYPE!!!! Now that is so worth it!!!!

If a phon is going to sell for 600 bucks and does not have 3.5 G support, then you are so wasting your money!!!

In my opinion, I think Steve Jobs will be lucky if he sells 1 million!

Just my thoughts ...
kingsingh at 2007-11-15 14:26:59 >
# 87 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I wonder if u can buy the thing wo Cingular service. So if ur not using the phone, why force u into a contract?

However, carrying two gadgets when u can have one is tempting eh?

No you won't be able to use an iPhone unless you get the 2 year phone plan with AT&T. Without it, you'll just have an expensive iBrick.:cool:
Pearson at 2007-11-15 14:27:52 >
# 88 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
When will the iPhone be in canada!!
bakemen80 at 2007-11-15 14:28:53 >
# 89 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
The short answer is that nobody knows. All we know is that Rogers is almost certain to be the carrier, since it's a GSM phone.

Rumours abound about when Rogers will be carrying it, but due to the fact that as of mid-June they were "not very far" in their negotiations with Apple, it's unlikely that we'll see anything before the fall.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 14:29:58 >
# 90 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Two questions for the "guru's"

1. Is there is a zoom feature on the camera?

2. Can you add other photo albums other than the "camera roll"?

And I love this site!!!! I swear I registered a year or so back but I could not locate my user and password so I registered again. Great advice found here!
devils advocate at 2007-11-15 14:30:59 >
# 91 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I have the iphone but I want to sync my FireFox NOT Internet explorer which I do not use...anyone know if this can be done somehow or if Apple will update their system to be able to sync Bookmarks from Firefox?

Thanks,
B.
Brutus22 at 2007-11-15 14:32:04 >
# 92 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I've had to do it manually, export Firefox bookmarks, then import them to Safari then sync

Bill
SouthsideIrish at 2007-11-15 14:32:58 >
# 93 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
wait for about 2 years for a new and improved iphone maybe cheaper and crap like that for the mean time im buying a helio ocean those things are S.W.E.E.T. and here is my list of features the iphone HAS to add before i shell out $600.00 for it:

3G support,some type of mobile itunes,5+ mega pixel camera with zoom video recorder and the ability to upload video and photo to the web and in txt msgs,flash and java support for online games like runescape (not that i play runescape),MMS,im client built in,landscape qwerty,cheaper around 3-$400.00 and all of the stuff it already has.:D EDIT:more memory around 30+ and expandable memory
the god of the at 2007-11-15 14:34:05 >
# 94 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I have a few questions!

is there a way to get an iPhone just to use the internet on it? I dont really fancy the phone because I dont need one but I love the thought of having youtube on a iPhone. Is there any way I could get one to just use the internet to browse youtube video all the time?
RenePerezz at 2007-11-15 14:35:00 >
# 95 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Well, officially the answer would basically be no, since you have to activate the iPhone with an AT&T account before it will do anything at all.

That having been said, there are several hacks available to activate the iPhone without signing up for an AT&T account, however these initially broke the YouTube client for some reason, and I believe some folks have only recently started to figure out how to re-enable this.

Of course, without an AT&T account, you're obviously going to be confined to only being able to access the Internet on WiFi.
jhollington at 2007-11-15 14:36:01 >
# 96 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
Just a random note... the annoying pre-paid SMS messages that gophone users were complaining about are gone. You now only get the pop-up messages when money is deducted from your account, i.e. sending a text message or placing a phone call. You no longer get them for using free services. The pop-ups were quite annoying, as they were not normal SMS messges, but ones that took up the full screen and required you to acknowlege all of them before being able to use other phone functions. If you had your phone on during the night,you may have ended up with 20+ messages to click through before being able to make (or even worse, take) a phone call. They were much like the phone bills in that regard, in that they gave you tons of useless messages instead of only the needed ones.

I'm glad AT&T has fixed this, there were rumors they were not going to do anything about it. This should make any people unable to obtain a contract less apprehensive about purchasing an iPhone. Especially now that Apple is offering refurbished iPhones.
Germansuplex at 2007-11-15 14:37:04 >
# 97 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I love this product. Very smooth looking and simple to use(if you watched the KeyNotes). I am going to get this Iphone.
GSA190 at 2007-11-15 14:38:08 >
# 98 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
and now you know why it is the jesus phone.
deftdrummer1 at 2007-11-15 14:39:12 >
# 99 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
the new updated sw is it going to have flash support for the internet safari and streaming radio internet capabilities?
pik. at 2007-11-15 14:40:07 >
# 100 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
says who pik
deftdrummer1 at 2007-11-15 14:41:05 >
# 101 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
just asking...
pik. at 2007-11-15 14:42:08 >
# 102 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
says who pik

To actually answer his question...

No one knows what will be in the next update. There's plenty of speculation but about the only thing we know for sure will be in there is the Wi-Fi iTunes store. Pretty much everything else is speculation.
Surf Monkey at 2007-11-15 14:43:16 >
# 103 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
My good wife has indicated that she plans to get me an iphone for Christmas and has offered to go ahead and buy it now rather than later. I wonder if Apple will offer any additional upgrades or price changes before Christmas. Should I get it now or wait until mid-Decamber?
tulsagentleman at 2007-11-15 14:44:16 >
# 104 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
My good wife has indicated that she plans to get me an iphone for Christmas and has offered to go ahead and buy it now rather than later. I wonder if Apple will offer any additional upgrades or price changes before Christmas. Should I get it now or wait until mid-Decamber?

Probably be a cut 15 days after you purchase yours. :D

Seriously, no one knows.

M.

-----
$200.00 iPhone Beta Tester
marcfogel at 2007-11-15 14:45:12 >
# 105 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
I have a few questions

1) Do you think apple will make gps possible through an update or is that a software thing?
2) Is it true the camera can't zoom?
3) Do you think apple will make video recording possible on the next iphone?
HeIsLegend at 2007-11-15 14:46:14 >
# 106 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
God I hope so...if not apple a third party will...
Iphonenotsogood at 2007-11-15 14:47:21 >
# 107 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
My good wife has indicated that she plans to get me an iphone for Christmas and has offered to go ahead and buy it now rather than later. I wonder if Apple will offer any additional upgrades or price changes before Christmas. Should I get it now or wait until mid-Decamber?
The next series will be WAY better than the ones now...so if you can grit your teeth and wait a year, I think you will be way happier!! There is a ton of stuff mine cant do that drives me crazy...so it really depends on what you can deal with. It was my own implusive behavior that made me get one before researching it fully...things to keep in mind...you cant really send pictures from the iphone to another phone readily...some say it can be done, but I cannot make it work. If you receive a text message with an attachment, you have to go through a conveluded procedure to get the image. You cant save emails, store files, ringtones are locked and you have to pay twice for the songs, no gps, no video, no zoom, no flash...

Lots of cool stuff, but the bad far outwieghs the good in my opinion. In retrospect I would wait until they get this stuff fixed...I wish I had
Iphonenotsogood at 2007-11-15 14:48:15 >
# 108 Re: The official iPhone discussion thread
then sell it man, if its such a terrible phone. Super high resale value still.
deftdrummer1 at 2007-11-15 14:49:17 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]