Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

P2P for AAC?

Anybody know of a good p2p program for finding AAC files? After hearing AAC in comparison to my MP3 collection, and re-ripping most of my collection, I don't think I can go back to MP3. But on Kazaa and the like, EVERYTHING is MP3.
[238 byte] By [seinman] at [2007-11-9 15:08:06]
# 1 Re: P2P for AAC?
AAC would make up several percent of all digital files on the net - if that. Even if there was a P2P program for people like you, there wouldn't be many people on it.
Adam at 2007-11-15 17:40:32 >
# 2 Re: P2P for AAC?
Adam, you forgot to mention that the primary source of most AAC files these days is iTunes and the iTMS. Even if a P2P source did exist it wouldn't help much since AAC files made with iTunes and as such would be useless (up to a point) for hundreds if not thousands of people because of the DRM (Digital Rights Management, or copy protection in laymans terms).

It's a nice idea in principle but defeats the purpose of iTunes, iTunes Music Store and the capability of iPods to handle AAC to begin with.

I for one have done enough downloading of music over the years and have found the quality of maybe 95% of what I've snagged to be useless. Using GSpot (a program to determine which MP3 encoder was used to create a given MP3 file) I've come to the conclusion that the MP3 community at large just hasn't a clue about how to get even decent sound quality when encoding.

There was a time when 128Kbps MP3 files were the norm but that time passed years ago. If you're not using LAME to encode your MP3 files (or you didn't use it when you made the ones you've already got) you're missing out on a lot.

Just my two cents.

br0adband
br0adband at 2007-11-15 17:41:41 >
# 3 Re: P2P for AAC?
Yeah, i'm used to hearing bad MP3s from P2P networks. I was hoping that there would be a way to find AACs... even if there are fewer of them out there, in general, the people who rip them are of, let's say, a higher technical intelligence than those who rip MP3s, therefore making it worth the extra time to find them.
seinman at 2007-11-15 17:42:39 >
# 4 Re: P2P for AAC?
in all honesty has anybody heard some really bad sounding tracks on iTunes or is it just me? For instance Goo Goo Dolls - Here is Gone...i could swear that on iTunes it sounds terrible...i dled a 320kbps mp3 and it sounds a lot better...is there an explanation or have my ears decieved me? :(
Riceboi at 2007-11-15 17:43:45 >
# 5 Re: P2P for AAC?
The switch is happening, I am seeing more and more AAC all the time :P
sailgreg at 2007-11-15 17:44:44 >
# 6 Re: P2P for AAC?
Originally posted by Riceboi
in all honesty has anybody heard some really bad sounding tracks on iTunes or is it just me? For instance Goo Goo Dolls - Here is Gone...i could swear that on iTunes it sounds terrible...i dled a 320kbps mp3 and it sounds a lot better...is there an explanation or have my ears decieved me? :(

I read some posts on other Forums around the Net and have noticed other people making complaints about AAC and how it's encoded. The two most popular ways available presently are by: a) using QuickTime to do it or b) using iTunes to do it. Even though iTunes installs QuickTime alongside itself, the two programs seem to have different ways of encoding AAC files (even on the same PC).

Here's a link to the one I found first (and this is from someone whose opinion I trust and is wel known across the audio community):

Encoding differences between QuickTime and iTunes (http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~m.heijligers/ipod/encodingsettings.html)

Give it a read. You might be suprised, but in your case you may have just landed on a particularly bad encoding. It happens, I'm just sure why.

:confused:

br0adband
br0adband at 2007-11-15 17:45:43 >
# 7 Re: P2P for AAC?
sorry sorry i meant on the music store~
Riceboi at 2007-11-15 17:46:47 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]