Bose
I have heard people flaming bose a lot in these forums, and I don't understand why. Bose makes excellent quality speakers, even though they may be a little overpriced. If you actually think about the technology that bose puts into their speakers, the price is well worth it. In my parents house (i'm only 15) my dad has bought: origional 301's, 151's, Acoustimass ? (don't know the model # (sub isn't powered), 301 IV's, and 201 III's or IV's. I have heard other branded speakers and I think that bose is definately #1 or #2 (Polk has some good stuff, too). I also just recieved the Quietcomfort 2's for my birthday, and they sound great, too. I have also listened to an audiophile setup that my uncle has, which was extremely expensive ($20,000+) custom made speakers (his setup is amazing), and i agree that bose wouldnt ever stand up to that kind of setup. But...bose speakers/headphones are difinately worth their price if you can afford them.
# 1 Re: Bose
my 2003 Nissan car has a "premium" bose system and I can tell you that it sucks.
7 speaker system (including subwoofer)
-not enough bass
-the midrange is way too high
-the bose head unit has no equalizer, only treble and bass control.
# 2 Re: Bose
I'm talkin about home speakers...bose isnt known for car systems...they just put their name on it so they could charge a lot of money.
# 3 Re: Bose
well, i haven't flamed bose yet, but i can always start.
1. bose home theater packages: poor sound, poor components, not even a real receiver in the box. the connections are all proprietary, and almost everything you already have will not be compatible. unbelievably overpriced.
2. bose speakers: poor sound, low power, very poor low end capabilities. mid range always sounded a bit numb, imho. again, unbelievably overpriced.
you can assemble a respectable home theater system using above average consumer equipment such as harmon kardon, infinity, klipsch, etc for the same price as a bose system and it will be a lot more powerful and sound better. heck, i've heard computer speaker set ups by logitch and creative that sound better than bose at hundreds less.
bose has always had a stigma among every audiophile i know as being an "old man's cheap minor league entry into audio playback." please note, i'm not insulting you...
there is but ONE rule to being an audiophile. your ears make the final judgement. if it sounds good to you, than that's all that matters.
but, you are 15, so you might not have had a lot of experience with sound systems. why not burn a cd of your favorite songs (don't use mp3's, use .wav or .aiff files) and head on down to an electronics store? sample some of their systems. keep in mind nothing ever really sounds right in those listening booths. stores like best buy are noisy and crowded. hi fi buys has some pretty good listening rooms though (although they feature more of a low to mid range audiophile selection, which means $$$).
in my experience, i could never use bose. i listen to a lot of electronic music, and it tends to wear speakers heavily. bose speakers would all pop down the line like a string of fire crackers if i played some dom & roland or autechre... :)
eventually i'll just get a pair of studio monitors. it's not surround sound, but when the bass punches and the all the synth sounds are fluttering the way they should (like in alesis speakers) i'll be content... :D
# 4 Re: Bose
Bose do one thing and one thing well - Lifestyle systems. Designed to fit into the design of a home unobtrusively.
From an SQ point of view, there is a LOT better out there for the price, and in fact for a lot less.
D
# 5 Re: Bose
Bose has the best marketing department in the audio industry. They convince the user that it is high-tech gear even though it uses nothing that wasn't developed 20+ years ago.
Frankly, there are many better home speaker products than bose. If you don't believe me, take some accurate frequency response and time domain measurements on any bose product. You will always find huge holes (e.g. d advertised 50hz-20kHz response... +-3db, but not mentioning an 8db hole that occurs between 200-600hz), running their drivers into their breakup regions which colors the sound, having horrible off-axis frequency response, etc. Not to mention that Bose is totally invested in practically untreated paper cones that begin to lose stiffness a couple of years after manufacture.
I was initially impressed with their noise-cancelling headsets (particularly when they first came out for aviation use in the mid-90's). But now many other companies offer products with almost identical performance, often at a better price. I've switched to using the Etymotic ER-6 earbuds/earplug in high ambient noise settings. They are smaller, much more revealing, and don't require additional power.
terry at 2007-11-15 15:20:04 >

# 6 Re: Bose
I have to agree with geistwerks on this. Bose products are overpriced for the quality of equipment you get. With the cost of one of those systems you could get a decent reciever and a speaker set the likes of Paradigm, PSB or Energy that would be eons better than the Bose setup. Bose has become a status symbol for some reason over the years. The mass market consumer has been brainwashed that Bose must be good because it's expensive.
My father bought a pair of bookshelf Bose a few years back. They were one of the more expensive models and they sounded ok, he was using them as background music. Out of curiosity I put them up against a pair of Paradigm Titans I have. I had them in the same room powered by all the same equipment. There was no contest, the Titan's sounded so much better. The Titan's had better bass and smoother highs. The mids were sweeter and the soundstage was broader. Switching between the Bose and the Titan's was like night and day, the Bose reminded me of the sound from a cheap boombox. I tried to tweak the Bose's sound by changing placement, electronics and interconnects. I just could not get the Bose to sound good. What's funny about this is that the Paradigm's were less than half the price of the Bose.
I also recently tried out those Quiet Comfort 2's. They are ok, but the Grado SR60's blow them away. The Grado's are so much smoother and there is more bass presence. The Grado's are only $70 compared to the Bose's $300. Albeit, the Grado's are not noise cancelling, but IMHO they just sound better.
I'm not really out to bash Bose. If that's what you like, then good for you. They have made some intersting products, like the wave radio and the wave music system. These products are nice, but very expensive. Basically a $500 clock radio and a $1300 boombox.
Do as geistwerks said and bring some CD's to a decent audio shop. I'm not talking Best Buy or Circuit City. I mean small shops that deal with higher end audio. You don't necessaraly have to the listen to expensive stuff, just tell that that you want to hear some more budget minded equipment. Tell them you've heard Bose and want to hear what can be had for the same money.
Go here (http://www.intellexual.net/bose.html) for some interesing reading from a guy who really dislikes Bose.
# 7 Re: Bose
just out of curiosity...how is the Klipsch Energy line? i'm looking at getting a setup in my room, and i need speakers, and a reciever (i my dad has 2 yamaha recievers in the house that are pretty high end $700+) and i was wondering if anyone has any suggestions. Also, has anybody built their own speakers? is it hard? cost effective? thanks
# 8 Re: Bose
Building your own speakers is an art form. Alot of trial and error is involved. If you have the time and money it could be a good project. I'd love to do a set using Vifa and Dynaudio drivers.
Klipsch makes good speakers. I've heard the Referance and Heritage lines. I don't usually like the sound of horn speakers, but I do like the Klipsch that I have heard. I haven't heard the Energy series yet.
How much are you looking to spend on a system? I'm sure some people here can come up with some suggestions based on budget.
# 9 Re: Bose
i don't really have a budget, but i think i can convince my dad to give me his old dalhquist dqm-5's. ARe these any good? if these speakers are any good then i would like a reciever, anything under $500 thats good?, and then mayber get some klipsch speakers later if the dqm's arent good.
# 10 Re: Bose
Those Dahlquists are pretty old, as long as they are not dry rotted, they should be pretty good. If you just want to do stereo and don't have a need for a tuner, go with an integrated amp. The Rega Brio and Marantz PM-7000 are nice. If you really want a full blown reciever, I'd go with the Denon AVR-1804 or AVR-2803, the NAD T-742 is also good.
# 11 Re: Bose
Originally posted by Debaser
my 2003 Nissan car has a "premium" bose system and I can tell you that it sucks.
7 speaker system (including subwoofer)
-not enough bass
-the midrange is way too high
-the bose head unit has no equalizer, only treble and bass control.
That's the car buddy. The japanese aren't known for high quality cars, they are known for cheap cars. Pick up a Caddilac with a Bose Audio Setup, it's the best sounding car system your going to find, and all the features and settings you want are right in the dashboard of the car where the radio and cd players are etc.
# 12 Re: Bose
Originally posted by geistwerks
the connections are all proprietary, and almost everything you already have will not be compatible.
I can confirm this with the bose system in my car. Instead of one amp powering all the speakers, bose has it set up that all the speakers have their own mini-amp. It sucks that I can't just replace certain components in my system (if i want to upgrade the speakers, then the head unit won't be able to power them or if i upgrade the head unit the bose speakers won't hook up to it cuz they run on the wrong ohms). If I want any upgrade I have to rip out the entire system! argh.
# 13 Re: Bose
Originally posted by aviationwiz
That's the car buddy. The japanese aren't known for high quality cars, they are known for cheap cars. Pick up a Caddilac with a Bose Audio Setup, it's the best sounding car system your going to find, and all the features and settings you want are right in the dashboard of the car where the radio and cd players are etc.
eh...i think I'll stick with my Z.
http://www.autointell.com/asian_companies/nissan/nissan-350z/nissan-350z-front-side-silver-350-225.jpg
and im pretty sure japanese cars are more known for being the most reliable.
# 14 Re: Bose
Originally posted by aviationwiz
That's the car buddy. The japanese aren't known for high quality cars, they are known for cheap cars. Pick up a Caddilac with a Bose Audio Setup, it's the best sounding car system your going to find, and all the features and settings you want are right in the dashboard of the car where the radio and cd players are etc.
That's a pretty brash statement. I've heard the Bose system in a Cadillac, not bad, but the Mark Levinson system in the Lexus SC blows it away. The Carver system in the BMW Z3 is also #### good. I have Bose in my truck, it's not bad, but it's nowhere near the systems in the Lexus or BMW.
# 15 Re: Bose
Originally posted by aviationwiz
That's the car buddy. The japanese aren't known for high quality cars, they are known for cheap cars. Pick up a Caddilac with a Bose Audio Setup, it's the best sounding car system your going to find, and all the features and settings you want are right in the dashboard of the car where the radio and cd players are etc.
You've got to be kidding. Every objective study of reliability or customer satisfaction for the last 15 years has been dominated by Japanese cars. Several Japanese makes are sold for less money, have fewer repairs, have less expensive repairs, and have more satisfied customers than Caddilac. You should restrict your Caddilac sales efforts to your dealership.
At any rate, I am happy that you enjoy your Bose system. I tend to find them inferior, both in sound quaility and in longevity, to most aftermarket brands. As far as I know, none of the bose units have input jacks or can be retrofited with inputs (like most units with a CD changer). For that reason, they won't have the best quaility sound with an ipod source.
terry at 2007-11-15 15:30:17 >

# 16 Re: Bose
does anybody know wheter the mazdaspeed protege's sound system is good? i'm lookin at it for my first car if i can save up enough money...also...any suggestions for my speaker setup in my room?
# 17 Re: Bose
Originally posted by breakaway1029
does anybody know wheter the mazdaspeed protege's sound system is good? i'm lookin at it for my first car if i can save up enough money...also...any suggestions for my speaker setup in my room?
Frankly, the ipodlounge forum isn't the best place to ask these questions. There are discussion groups all over that deal more specifically with these issues.
You might also be most specific when you formulate the question. What is your budget? What type of music do you listen to? How loud do you need it to be? Are you interested in hi-fidelity vs chest-thumping bass? What is the amp/source that will go with the speakers.
terry at 2007-11-15 15:32:20 >

# 18 Re: Bose
#1
I was wondering whether the car had a good system (can it accept the ipod)
#2
If you look earlier in the post it was agreed upon that i don't really want bose in my room, even though i like them, and i was looking for alternatives... and a reciever to drive dahlquist or another speaker (possibly using ipod as source if it would sound good?)
# 19 Re: Bose
Originally posted by breakaway1029
#1
I was wondering whether the car had a good system (can it accept the ipod)
check out mazda's website for the system specs, also see if any of the stock head units have a line in or are already set up for use with an mp3 player (not sure about mazda, but other car companies are catching on to the use of portable hard drive based mp3 players and have adjusted their sound systems accordingly...lucky us :) )
Also check out the in-car-solution forum here on the lounge to see if anyone has been using an iPod with their protoge.
mikey at 2007-11-15 15:34:23 >

# 20 Re: Bose
Yeah I'm not into Bose flaming either. I have a "premium" Bose system in my car (Mercedes, if you must ask) and it sounds pretty #### good, better than what was in my last car (Lexus, because I know someone will ask too).
Also, I happen to mind numbingly expensive Bose sound system for my Home Theater and it sounds simply stunning.
I plan on asking for Quiet Comfort 2 headphones for Christmas.
They might be overpriced, but there is no way they have poor sound quality.
People who flame just can't shell out the cash!
gooer at 2007-11-15 15:35:24 >

# 21 Re: Bose
People who flame just can't shell out the cash!
Its not that we cannot afford it, it's just that there is way better stuff that is a lot less expensive than bose out there. But if the bose sound (no highs and no lows) is what you preffer and you can afford it, then go ahead.
Your bose sound system that "sounds simply stunning", may not be my cup of tea. I would rather have a nice integrated amp, a nice cd player, and pair of Paradigms, B&W's or PSB's (the list goes on) and save my self a few hundred bucks compared to Bose.
And I have heard the Quiet Comfort 2's with an iPod; IMO they sound like crap compared to a pair of Grado SR-60's which are 20-30 bucks cheaper. Heck, I think the $30 Koss Porta-Pro's sound better than the Quiet Comfort 2's. But that is just the way I feel.
I can definitely afford the Bose lifestyle system, or whatever it's called, but I think that if you are looking for quality and good sound, look elsewhere.
# 22 Re: Bose
Bose?? definitly not the best in terms of price and sound but hey it does a pretty good job in looks... but like geistwerks said.. it all depends on your preference... just like how some audiophile thinks vinyl records or LPs are superb compared to digital recordings...
i've own a set of acoustimass speakers although they are nothing compared to my Mcintosh system or B&W... they are in no way poor quality... so i really don't see the point in flaming bose threads... plus... would someone flame a thread that praises Maserati or Ferrari when they are overpriced, interior is ONLY decent, and engine is way too loud... over other cars you can get for 1/2 the price?
and on the topic of cars.. if possible don't get anything factory... since they never sound as good as aftermarket for the same price... my E-class has a 7 speaker system that sounds decent but is nothing in terms of clearness, smoothness or bassy as my previous car with JL audio amps, and focal speakers
phibu at 2007-11-15 15:37:25 >

# 23 Re: Bose
no highs...no lows....it must be bose!
# 24 Re: Bose
Go listen to some Paradigm speakers and tell me Bose is good quality again.
I test listened a pair of Paradigm Atoms ($189 a pair) against a Bose Lifestyle System with Subwoofer and the Paradigm pair (without subwoofer) wiped the floor with the Bose.
Bose aren't *bad* speakers per se, they just charge WAAAYYY too much for them. They should be on par with those cheap "Home Theater in a Box" things they sell everywhere.
I wouldn't trade my Paradigm system, which cost about the same as one of those Bose packages for anything.
--Matt
PS. Bose speaker cones are CARDBOARD, I'll take my composite surrounds, with Ceramic tweeters and real rubber speaker surrounds any day over the overpriced cardboard speakers that are bose.
# 25 Re: Bose
Yeah, I remember an article I read about the materials that Bose uses to create some of their speakers--not top quality components, but they charge top quality prices. Bose is OK, and seem to do a lot of business from name recognition, and a perception that their stuff is top of the line, when in reality it is relatively high priced for what it delivers (I hesitate to use the term "snob appeal", but, well in all honesty I think that is a large part of their popularity--not that I'm accusing anyone of that in here, with perhaps the exception of the "shell out the cash" comment). But Paradigm is definitely a major step up from Bose IMHO, as is Klipsch, Polk etc., etc. I'll give Bose credit for pushing the industry toward miniaturiziation, which comes in handy, especially for home theaters, but for quality of sound, while not bad, it's not great either--IMHO it's simply overrpriced.
dmt1 at 2007-11-15 15:40:32 >
