Categories: Misc / DotNet / Java / Coder / Linux / PHP Ask - La ask - La Answer

OS X for Windows

Can OS X work with Windows? Does anyone know if there is a Jaguar for Windows out there?
Thanks.
[100 byte] By [CanaMacPod] at [2007-11-9 11:40:55]
# 1 Re: OS X for Windows
Hi,
Mac OS X is an operating system. Right now it is only available for PowerPC based Systems, but there are rumours that it is in Development for x86-based Systems.
The Question cant be answered like this. Its like asking "Is BMW available for Fords ?" ;)
robat at 2007-11-15 18:08:59 >
# 2 Re: OS X for Windows
Apple probably won't ever release OSX for Windows, because unlike Microsoft, which is a siftware company, Apple is a Total Package company. They sell software and hardware, and see the two as essential to each other.
eustacescrubb at 2007-11-15 18:09:59 >
# 3 Re: OS X for Windows
Hey,
could anyone explain to me what "MacOS X for Windows" should mean ? Or do you mean Aqua for Windows ?
Robert
robat at 2007-11-15 18:11:08 >
# 4 Re: OS X for Windows
Nope, there is no OS X for PCs. However, the Rhapsody OS does work on PCs. It was a next-gen OS created by Apple around 1998 and provides the framework for OS X. In fact, a lot of applications on OS X remain virtually the same as their Rhapsody counterparts.

Rhapsody does not feature the aqua interface (instead it looks strikingly similar to OS 9, with a few subtle differences). But if you want a Mac OS on your PC, Rhapsody is probably the only way to go.

BTW, Rhapsody was actually created by Apple, but was never actually released. It can still be found in beta form on P2P clients however.
Cozzie at 2007-11-15 18:12:02 >
# 5 Re: OS X for Windows
THanks, people, that's kind of what I assumed, but I read some review of OS X and they said something about it being able to run on PCs. I guess the author was on acid?
CanaMacPod at 2007-11-15 18:13:01 >
# 6 Re: OS X for Windows
There's a rumor that, somewhere in the depths of the earth beneath Cuppertino, there is a fully updated Wintel copy of OS X that matches the current development copy of Jaguar. It's called "Marklar." It can run on any Pentium-compatible system, and it can run any software for OSX.

I'll believe it when I see it (or install it, heh), of course. I'd sure like to give it a whirl, no doubt.

If it exists at all, that is.
c.c.r. at 2007-11-15 18:14:11 >
# 7 Re: OS X for Windows
Well that is quite interesting c.c.r. Something to think about.
CanaMacPod at 2007-11-15 18:15:04 >
# 8 Re: OS X for Windows
If you are desperate to have the look of OS X then you could always try this ( http://www.jonmega.com/~iceman/).

I think Adam or Kurt may have downloaded this set.??
Bob at 2007-11-15 18:16:06 >
# 9 Re: OS X for Windows
Cool, thanks Mad!
CanaMacPod at 2007-11-15 18:17:04 >
# 10 Re: OS X for Windows
Aye, Bob, Iceman's is cool though.

Thing is, to install everything is a giant pain in the ###. For reals.

Isn't the whole point of the OS X thing to eliminate pains in our arses? :D

Sides, it's not the look I'm after, it's the code. I wanna run that OS and, naturally, run the software that runs on that OS.

I just don't wanna have to buy any extra hardware. ;)
c.c.r. at 2007-11-15 18:18:05 >
# 11 Re: OS X for Windows
So how easy is it to download and install? Is there anything I should know before I try it out?
CanaMacPod at 2007-11-15 18:19:14 >
# 12 Re: OS X for Windows
Originally posted by c.c.r.
Aye, Bob, Iceman's is cool though.

Thing is, to install everything is a giant pain in the ###. For reals.

Isn't the whole point of the OS X thing to eliminate pains in our arses? :D

Sides, it's not the look I'm after, it's the code. I wanna run that OS and, naturally, run the software that runs on that OS.

I just don't wanna have to buy any extra hardware. ;)

Kurt,
I agree. But sometimes fancy clothes is enough!!

I will pray to the great OS in the sky for Apple to release OS X for Windows, every night:D

Better draw a line right now before we're accused of starting a platform war;)
Bob at 2007-11-15 18:20:11 >
# 13 Re: OS X for Windows
instructions are on the site
http://www.jonmega.com/~iceman/vs/install_instructions.php

installing themes arent hard, just have to pay attention unless you use StyleXP, which is included in the link above.

it can make you system go nutz.. always backup before attempting mods like this !

good luck.

also check out
http://www.themexp.org/
2000NB18T at 2007-11-15 18:21:18 >
# 14 Re: OS X for Windows
Originally posted by MadPict
Kurt,
I agree. But sometimes fancy clothes is enough!!

I will pray to the great OS in the sky for Apple to release OS X for Windows, every night:D

Better draw a line right now before we're accused of starting a platform war;)

OMG, how cool would that be?! A dual-boot Pentium 4 booting Windows XP and Mac OS X! Schweeeeeeeet!!!
c.c.r. at 2007-11-15 18:22:13 >
# 15 Re: OS X for Windows
Can anyone help me install the dock thing? It wont work at all. Anyone, please?
Thanks.
CanaMacPod at 2007-11-15 18:23:16 >
# 16 Re: OS X for Windows
Try this dock ( http://www.stardock.com/products/objectdock/) instead.
Joe at 2007-11-15 18:24:20 >
# 17 Re: OS X for Windows
ive used MobyDock ( http://www.mobydock.tk/)

works very well. no registry entries.. nada all resides in its own folder. nothing to install.
2000NB18T at 2007-11-15 18:25:17 >
# 18 Re: OS X for Windows
Now all I need is that top menu type dealy and I am all set.
LIke you know the file, edit, time, apple symbol...
couchpotato at 2007-11-15 18:26:22 >
# 19 Re: OS X for Windows
Wow, that Moby Dock software is SO cool...thanks...
destined_wind at 2007-11-15 18:27:19 >
# 20 Re: OS X for Windows
Hmmm... isn't there an emulator for PC that runs Mac called Fusion? I heard that once, and thought it'd be a good idea for people with a pc, and not enough $$ for a mac.
Impulse29 at 2007-11-15 18:28:21 >
# 21 Re: OS X for Windows
there's lots o' mac emu's out there but they pretty much max out at 68040 compatibility (i.e. 68k).

fusion, softmac, and my fav...executer 32 by ardi soft.

money isn't always a reason not to use a mac, you know... ;)
AMG at 2007-11-15 18:29:16 >
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]