Not Quite What It Claims...
What a shame to buy the $500 30G iPod, only to find - after you get it home - that you need the (not included) wire to allow you to connect to your non-Fire Wire equipped computer. In the end, easiest solution was to buy (for another $40) a Fire Wire board. For someone like me - never made ANY modification to a computer's hardware, a daunting task. However, with no alternative, I guess I should be thanking Apple for enhancing my skills! Not likely; instead it'll be a case of reminding everyone who admires it that they should be very aware before parting with their money. Hopefull tonight I'll actually get to use the thing. I just know that if I tried this kind of lack of consideration of end user in my job, we'd be out of business. Won't matter to behemoth like Apple, but bad reviews have a habit of being "louder" than good feedback. Tick, tick, tick.:(
# 1 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
It's very very easy to install a firewire card.
I haven't done much hardware wise on my computer, besides adding a hard drive... but adding a firewire card was 10x easier. Firewire cards are PCI cards, so all you have to do is take out the screws, insert the card, and put back the screws.
Easy.
Then just reboot and install the drivers included with the CD. PCI upgrades are probably the easiest upgrades to make on a computer... besides adding RAM.
Oh, btw, Newegg.com has some incredibly cheap firewire cards.
# 2 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
it's pretty much common knowledge that you need a firewire card to use it... i would have done more research beforehand if i were you :\ it's considered one of its main advantages
i hope you enjoy your new ipod now that everything's in place :)
scarf at 2007-11-15 14:16:56 >

# 3 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Scarf..I think he might be referring th USB 2.0 support...not sure...
jimlat at 2007-11-15 14:17:52 >

# 4 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Actually when I bought my iPod from the Apple Store, the guy said to me "Do you have a firewire card?" He rocked.
# 5 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by IPOD1STTIMER
What a shame to buy the $500 30G iPod, only to find - after you get it home - that you need the (not included) wire to allow you to connect to your non-Fire Wire equipped computer. In the end, easiest solution was to buy (for another $40) a Fire Wire board. For someone like me - never made ANY modification to a computer's hardware, a daunting task. However, with no alternative, I guess I should be thanking Apple for enhancing my skills! Not likely; instead it'll be a case of reminding everyone who admires it that they should be very aware before parting with their money. Hopefull tonight I'll actually get to use the thing. I just know that if I tried this kind of lack of consideration of end user in my job, we'd be out of business. Won't matter to behemoth like Apple, but bad reviews have a habit of being "louder" than good feedback. Tick, tick, tick.:(
You must not have researched the iPod at all - wherever you look, firewire is being verbalized...You should have looked at required specs...
And when you think about it, it would be a bad move for Apple to include USB with iPods since most users already have firewire (Macs, their intended users).
# 6 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by mongoos150
You must not have researched the iPod at all - wherever you look, firewire is being verbalized...You should have looked at required specs...
And when you think about it, it would be a bad move for Apple to include USB with iPods since most users already have firewire (Macs, their intended users).
you can connect ipods via usb 2.0
dyne at 2007-11-15 14:20:55 >

# 7 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
The bottom of my 15GB box says:
Windows Requirements
*PC with FireWire port or Windows-certified FireWire card
*Windows Me, Windows 2000, or Windows XP Home or ProfessionalI think that the iPod, at least in this regard, is exactly what it claims.
c.c.r. at 2007-11-15 14:22:00 >

# 8 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I think all iPod adverts mention the word 'firewire'. Then, it's up to you to find out what it is. Anyway before investing you do a little research right?...right? ;-)
# 9 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Squibbles: Thanks for the advice. Done. Everything working smoothly. Appreciate your help.
Scarf: Research? I agree; should've been smarter. However, all advice pointed to being able to use iPod with USB2. It was the omission of a cable (small beer, but an irritation considering the scale of the purchase) that surprised me. I get everything else, but not enough to actually use the thing!
Slider 10: You've got it. Maybe I should've asked, but it would have been cool to have the salesman prompt me. Not Apple's issue, we could say.
Mongoos 150: Got the caveat emptor message; thanks. Apple nearly went belly-up before for their isolationist approach. They may be flying today, but that's no guarantee for ever.
Dyne: That's what I thought too. It's the misssing cable thing that got me down. Done the Fire Wire modification, so all's well.
C.C.R: Quoting the spec from the box is so clever. You must feel so right. You do, however, miss the point. But hey, we'll both survive.
Lyonnais: Caveat emptor for a $500 mp3 player; sure.
# 10 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I think we're missing one important point that the O.P. made...
I agree, not including a USB cable is remiss. I'm surprised to hear that it's not supplied with the PC ipods. If you buy a printer, monitor, scanner, or whatever, and it supports a certain type of connection, then it's common industry practice and good business to supply the needed cable.
# 11 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
It also says it on the first iPod page on Apple's web site:
Syncing with USB 2.0 (Windows-only) requires optional USB 2.0 + FireWire Cable and free software update (available in June).
If you can hit this board, you can hit that page.
How is this different from all the fine print with Cell phone plans?
JYoung at 2007-11-15 14:26:03 >

# 12 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I think we're missing one important point that the O.P. made...
I agree, not including a USB cable is remiss. I'm surprised to hear that it's not supplied with the PC ipods. If you buy a printer, monitor, scanner, or whatever, and it supports a certain type of connection, then it's common industry practice and good business to supply the needed cable.
# 13 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
oops, sorry for the double post. stupid v*rizon dsl.
# 14 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Although I agree the USB cable should be included, in the long run you're better off with the firewire anyway--the USB does not power the ipod. Nothing like having your ipod run out of juice during a long synch...
Perhaps the most convienent thing for apple to do would be to package the ipod with either a USB or firewire cable (They're not going to package both, too many people wouldn't need one or the other cable), but on the other hand, I can see all the potential problems that would occur with this too--people not checking the box, and getting the wrong cable, misinformed salespersons telling PC owners that only the USB will work, etc.
The bottom line is, as Kurt said, it's the buyers responsibilty to check beforehand to see what the compatibility and included hardware are...
dmt1 at 2007-11-15 14:29:04 >

# 15 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
It took a lot of arm twisting I'm sure to get Apple to support USB 2.0 at all. But since FireWire is their baby, that's why they're only going to support USB 2.0 as minimally as possible. Which includes offloading the cost of the USB cable to the consumer to keep down the price of the iPod. Yeah, it's kinda lame but certainly no different than any other company would do in their same situation.
# 16 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Welcome to my world. Apple put me through hell by not including a USB cable. I don't want to go into it, but my website about apple and their lack of support/care will be up shortly (1~2 days). You can comment on their when you want to. Apple is simply spanking people who don't have an iMac, or an Apple PC. They've done it in the past, and they do it now. Why else is MM included instead of a custom program? Why else is firewire the default, and why is there a huge lack of support for USB people? Why does it seem like the winPod is simply an afterthought by Apple?
Apple is a terrible, terrible company. The iPod (once working) is by far the best mp3 player (flash memory or hard disk) that i have ever seen, but it is in jeoporday with Apple as it's creator.
# 17 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
oh yes, sorry, i forgot to add the :
"and why do you think the iPod doesn't support the wma format?"
which we all know is better than an mp3, although not as popular
# 18 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by thegamedevil666
Welcome to my world. Apple put me through hell by not including a USB cable. I don't want to go into it, but my website about apple and their lack of support/care will be up shortly (1~2 days). You can comment on their when you want to. Apple is simply spanking people who don't have an iMac, or an Apple PC. They've done it in the past, and they do it now. Why else is MM included instead of a custom program? Why else is firewire the default, and why is there a huge lack of support for USB people? Why does it seem like the winPod is simply an afterthought by Apple?
Apple is a terrible, terrible company. The iPod (once working) is by far the best mp3 player (flash memory or hard disk) that i have ever seen, but it is in jeoporday with Apple as it's creator. Of course they are "spanking" people who don't have an Apple computer. That's the whole point. It's called a business strategy - create advantages for the Mac platform to entice people to use it. Don't get me wrong, I'm a PC user too and am also getting the short end of the stick here. But I certainly don't begrudge Apple for what is an intelligent business strategy.
And by the way, this may your first time on the receiving end of "ye olde platform leveraging trick", but Mac users have to deal with it constantly. I mean, it's not like Microsoft has never held stuff back from Mac users!! Bottom line, iPod (for Windows) is still a fantastic product and as an iPod Windows user, I have zero complaints.
# 19 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by tonicboy
Of course they are "spanking" people who don't have an Apple computer. That's the whole point. It's called a business strategy - create advantages for the Mac platform to entice people to use it. Don't get me wrong, I'm a PC user too and am also getting the short end of the stick here. But I certainly don't begrudge Apple for what is an intelligent business strategy.
And by the way, this may your first time on the receiving end of "ye olde platform leveraging trick", but Mac users have to deal with it constantly. I mean, it's not like Microsoft has never held stuff back from Mac users!! Bottom line, iPod (for Windows) is still a fantastic product and as an iPod Windows user, I have zero complaints.
I'd rather Apple hold a product back from me, than give it to me and give me the short end of the stick. Also, if microsoft were to hold back on the iMac line of products, they have good cause. There is a very miniscule fanbase, wheras Apple is giving the short end of the stick to the advantage of people out there.
# 20 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
it's called business 101
everyone does it no matter how big their fanbase is. they do it so their fanbase grows.
scarf at 2007-11-15 14:35:12 >

# 21 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by scarf
it's called business 101
everyone does it no matter how big their fanbase is. they do it so their fanbase grows.
Well, I guess i'm an idiot then. I always thought the key to a successful business was PLEASING the customer.
# 22 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Just use the firewire and quit yer whinin'. Honestly it is the best way to use the iPod.
# 23 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Don't blame Apple that you don't have a firewire card.
# 24 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
This is in danger of being or becoming full of anti-Apple flamebait. I hope that the mods are watching carefully.
Apple chose Firewire as the default when it was either Firewire or USB 1. It happens to be superior to USB 1 and probably to USB 2, too. It's easy to upgrade any modern PC to have Firewire. Firewire was the right choice. MP3s are standard and not platform specific. WMA was of no interest to the company's initial core launch market. MP3 was the right choice.
Apple is not a terrible company, nor is it 'spanking PC users'. They've made a great product initially (I suspect) purely for Mac users, and have subsequently provided it to the PC market too.
# 25 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
They provided the best solution, and (as a bonus) made the thing compatible with USB 2 as well.
# 26 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I can't believe there are people out there that can't install a firewire card... sad, really...
# 27 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by thegamedevil666
Well, I guess i'm an idiot then. I always thought the key to a successful business was PLEASING the customer. Apple is going to design the iPod so it gives the Mac platform advantages. This is a given and something we all just need to deal with. Beyond that, the only thing PC users should be considering at all is, is this a good product for a Windows user?
The way to determine that is to ask yourself - if another company had produced the iPod as an mp3-only device with FireWire connectivity (and additional USB 2.0 option), MMJB instead of custom software and strictly for Windows, would you feel so slighted? I doubt it. You might not have quite as high an opinion of the product as if all the features you wanted were included but you certainly wouldn't feel that they had cheated you somehow.
# 28 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by thegamedevil666
I'd rather Apple hold a product back from me, than give it to me and give me the short end of the stick.
what?? who said you had to buy one? no one forced you too...
and yes, it's an apple product, so inheritantly there will be more advantages for mac users than pc users, as those perks will entice many PC users to "switch". it's called business...
and really, it would be stupid to include a firewire AND usb cable. as 90% of the people would be paying (the price would be changd accordingly) for a usb cable that they don't need as they already have firewire or are smart enough to know that firewire is better than usb 2.0 and buy a $15 firewire card.
# 29 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Give it up guys, an Ipod isn't going to make a PC user switch to a mac. Half of the world isn't even smart enough to know that there is a difference between a pc and a mac.
And no one said I had to buy one, but that's not what my statement meant. I was tyring to say that if Apple was going to release the Ipod for windows users, they might aswell have done it right, heck, maybe they should have made the windows version USB by default.
And mp3's are NOT the right choice. If wma was supported, I could fit double the songs on my Ipod, while retaining the same sound quality. The reason it isn't supported, and never will be supported, is because Microsoft makes it.
Tonicboy, your statement is true, if another company did all these things that Apple did, i probably wouldn't even care, but I highly doubt any other company would make this device with as many imperfections as I think it has.
And destined_wind, if that comment was directed at me, I'm not sure where I said it was hard to install a firewire card.
This isn't an Apple bashing thread. This is a "I don't think Apple puts enough thought into some of their idea's" thread.
I doubt I will be replying here again, unless something really juicy appears, so later.
# 30 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I think you have some valid points but I'm sure Apple puts more then enough thought into their ideas. Wether they make the right decisions is another story but I am sure they spent hundreds of hours thinking about these things and what would be best for the customer and their company.
I think Apple is smart not to use WMA. WMA was created by their direct competition and they are trying to use it to create a stranglehold on digital music. Microsoft would be the one who created the codec, who updated the codec, who let others use the codec, etc. If WMA becomes the standard in digital music, Microsofts power grows tremendously. They could push Apple out of the marketplace and dramatically damage their product if they wouldn't let Apple use it. Apple dosen't want that, but instead is pushing their codec, AAC. iPod dosen't support AAC and Zen dosen't support AAC, I am sure these companies thought ad nausem about these matters.
Personally, I am happy that you are even able to use such a wonderful device so well on Windows machines. While it may not be perfect, it still works pretty well. And I would probably be three times more likley to buy an Apple PC now then I would have been before I got my iPod so I suppose Apple has succeeded in one of their goals.
BigIzz at 2007-11-15 14:45:22 >

# 31 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
apple pc? :P
scarf at 2007-11-15 14:46:23 >

# 32 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
also im using windows and a prime reason why i got the ipod was its firewire connectivity
the only thing i find bad about firewire is that the plug is just so god#### hard to get out after its in :P
scarf at 2007-11-15 14:47:26 >

# 33 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by IPOD1STTIMER
What a shame to buy the $500 30G iPod, only to find - after you get it home - that you need the (not included) wire to allow you to connect to your non-Fire Wire equipped computer ...
I know exactly what you mean! The other day, I bought a $60 video game, only to find - after I got home - that you need the (not included) computer to allow you to play the game ... VERY misleading!
P.S. ever buy a printer lately? They don't include the USB cable either!
Phoomp at 2007-11-15 14:48:28 >

# 34 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
"bad reviews have a habit of being "louder" than good feedback. Tick, tick, tick."
- what did I tell you?
Thanks for all of the interest, especially from clued-in 666-guy - you get it! Didn't want to get into an anti-Apple tirade, but did want to express my disappointment. That's what these forums are (partly) for. Keep the faith (whatever it is - PC/Mac/whatever).
# 35 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by scabmettler
I agree, not including a USB cable is remiss. I'm surprised to hear that it's not supplied with the PC ipods.
Here's the thing- there are no "PC iPods" anymore. The 3G iPods are platform agnostic out of the box. When you plug one into either a Mac or a PC, it formats itself for that platform.
# 36 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
HAHAH you slam apple for being the way they are. but a PC users that can't install a FW card with out it being 'daunting' HAHAHAHAHAHHA
Shame on you!
Mike
# 37 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
Originally posted by thegamedevil666
Welcome to my world. Apple put me through hell by not including a USB cable. I don't want to go into it, but my website about apple and their lack of support/care will be up shortly (1~2 days). You can comment on their when you want to. Apple is simply spanking people who don't have an iMac, or an Apple PC. They've done it in the past, and they do it now. Why else is MM included instead of a custom program? Why else is firewire the default, and why is there a huge lack of support for USB people? Why does it seem like the winPod is simply an afterthought by Apple?
Apple is a terrible, terrible company. The iPod (once working) is by far the best mp3 player (flash memory or hard disk) that i have ever seen, but it is in jeoporday with Apple as it's creator.
DNFTT.
# 38 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
You, the viewer, can decide. I, for one, certainly think so. ;)
# 39 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
My mother can install / remove cards from her Microsoft PC. Why can't you? I don't see the point of making it a whole discussion topic. Go get a firewire card and start using your iPod. The solution is there and you're turning your face.
# 40 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
OK, no fingers being pointed at anyone, but can we try to exchange views and opinions in a civilised manner without the need to resort to name calling or barbed, sarcastic remarks. If you cannot do this then the thread will be locked.
Thank you.
Bob at 2007-11-15 14:55:34 >

# 41 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
I got screwed on an ebay deal for my ipod...I had to cutout cause the guy I was buying from could speak english or use paypal even though his auction said that he could. Anyway I am forced to buy from best buy now so that I am losing like 90$ (40 plus sales tax) and the sales tax is so high cause i have to buy the firewire card. So rather than this being a 375$ deal it has become a 425+$ deal. If you buy an Ipod you should get some type of certificate that gets you the port of your choice. Im 15, and have a job that I go to whenever im not in school. I probably have an income of around 1500$-2000$ a year. But im saving alot of this money for items I would want in the future. Its not that I don't wnt to spend the money on the ipod, but that its a fat pain in the ### to have to buy the firewire card also (30+$) and to have to pay sales tax for a 450$ item.
# 42 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
If you're strapped for cash why not go for a refurb 10 or 20 GB 2 Gen iPod?
# 43 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
As advised by squibbles (whom I subsequently thanked), I purchased and installed FireWire immediately and - as others have pointed out - much a-fear about nothing. We could, if it's OK with everyone, move on.
Or what about offering some advice on that non-MMJB conversion from 25gk to 128 while transferring query? Any ideas?
PS 2 Moderators: This probably borders on cross-posting, so I'll appreciate you creating that link thing, if you think this isn't the place (original post was in >Music>Digital Formats) Cheers.
# 44 Re: Not Quite What It Claims...
See IPOD1STTIMER's post on Conversion from 256k to 128k for loading ( http://ipodlounge.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4993) in the Music>Digital Formats.
You mean like that? :D
Bob at 2007-11-15 14:59:30 >
